I Calculating SCUBA Depth with Exhaled Air and Terminal Velocity

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr. Surgery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations Depth
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using exhaled air bubbles as a method to estimate ascent time when scuba diving without a depth gauge. Participants note the difficulty in tracking bubbles to the surface and suggest that bubble size could indicate depth. There is skepticism about the reliability of measuring bubble volume due to constant lung volume under pressure. An analogy is made to calculating height by timing a falling object, with a suggestion to research terminal velocity of bubbles for further insights. The conversation emphasizes the need for a systematic approach and encourages further exploration of the topic.
Dr. Surgery
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So if you were scuba diving and your depth gauge broke, could you create a system where you exhale some air and record the time it took to reach the surface. If so, what would they equation look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dr. Surgery said:
So if you were scuba diving and your depth gauge broke, could you create a system where you exhale some air and record the time it took to reach the surface. If so, what would they equation look like?
Fun question. But first of all, when I'm scuba diving, it's hard for me to see my bubbles all the way to the surface. And second of all, we prefer for posters to show some effort in their questions -- what have you found in your reading about this question? :smile:
 
Maybe the size of the bubbles may be a rough indicator of the depth.
Have you observed a difference in the average size as you go deeper?
 
While you may be able to observe the difference of the mass of the gas of the bubbles, wouldn´t the volume be the same because it is about how your lungs(Constant volume) will hold at a given depth/pressure, and I am not sure how reliable it would be to measure it. I am looking for an algorithm similar to dropping a rock, and counting how many seconds it takes for it to land to calculate how high a cliff is.
 
I did a Google search on Bubbles Reach Terminal Velocity, and got lots of good hits. Here's a paper that may be helpful for you:

http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1032465.files/Final%20Projects/Fluids%20Drag/Terminal%20Velocity.pdf

:smile:
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Back
Top