Calculating Self-Inductance and Capacitance in Parallel Plate Transmission Lines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating self-inductance and capacitance for parallel plate transmission lines. The magnetic field between the plates is derived using Ampere's Circuital Law, leading to the total field being B = μ₀J. The flux and self-inductance per unit length are explored, with the participant expressing confusion over the appropriate area for calculations and the application of Ampere's Law in a rectangular geometry. Additionally, the capacitance per unit length is addressed, and the relationship between self-inductance and capacitance is sought. The participant seeks guidance to clarify these concepts and calculations.
malindenmoyer
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Two very large parallel conducting plates of very large length l, and width w are separated by a distance d. A current I=Jw flows to the right in the lower plate and to the left in the upper plate. Each of the two currents produces a magnetic field \frac{B}{2} between the two plates.

(a) Show that the total field between the plates is B=\mu_0 J via Ampere's Circuital Law.

(b) Find the flux \phi and the self inductance per unit lenght, \frac{L}{l} for this arrangement.

(c) Find the capacitance per unit length, \frac{C}{l}.

(d) Find \sqrt{\frac{L}{C}} in terms of \mu_0, \epsilon_0 and geometrical factors

My Attempt at Solution
Part (a) is confusing as I have not used the circuital Law for rectangular geometry. I know that Ampere's Law is given by:

\oint_C \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{\ell} = \mu_0 I_{\mathrm{enc}}

But am confused as to how to apply it as it is not circular geometry.

In part (b) I know that:

\phi=BA

But am not sure as to what area to use, since we know B per part (a)

Solving for flux leads us one step closer to finding the self inductance which is:

L=\frac{N\phi}{I}

But again, I do not know what value to substitute in for N.

I am pretty sure I can find the capacitance per unit length per (c), and then (d) is a matter of combing (b) and (c) so that would be self explanatory. Could somebody help me get this thing started? Please keep in mind that I have a very elementary understanding of this material.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anybody?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top