Calculating Shear Strain in 3 Dimensions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of shear strain in three dimensions, focusing on the definitions and relationships between shear strain, normal strain, and angular changes. Participants explore the mathematical derivations and approximations involved in these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a webpage that outlines how to find shear strains as x and y components by dividing the change in length by the original length.
  • Another participant questions the combination of strains from the x and y axes to derive functions of tan, expressing confusion over the explanation provided in the referenced figure.
  • A participant raises a point about the definition of strain, suggesting that the strain along the x-axis should be calculated as Delta-x over X instead of Delta-x over Y.
  • It is noted that shear strain can be defined as either the angular change of an originally right angle or as the change in length divided by the orthogonal length, with a claim that for small angles, these definitions yield the same result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and calculations of shear strain, with some confusion surrounding the use of tangent versus sine in small angle approximations. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations of the concepts presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the relationships between shear strain and angular changes, as well as the definitions of the axes involved in the calculations. The discussion does not resolve these ambiguities.

v_pino
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
http://folk.ntnu.no/stoylen/strainrate/mathemathics/

This page shows how to find shear strain in three dimensions.

I understand how they found the shear strains as x and y components from dividing the change in length by the original length.

But from the line "From the figure, it is also evident that..." I cannot understand how they combined the strains from the x and y axes to find the functions of tan.

Also, how after I have found the functions of tan, how do I use approximation of small angles to find that the strains actually simply equals the angle itself? I have seen some other websites using sin instead of tan.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The tangent is the rise over the run: from the figure, \frac{\Delta x}{y}.

For small angles, \alpha\simeq\tan \alpha\simeq\sin\alpha. Is this where you got stuck, or is it in the derivation of this expression?
 
I thought strain should be the change in length over original length. So shouldn't the strain along the x-axis be Delta-x over X instead of Delta-x over Y?
 
As discussed right under that image, the normal strain is the change in length divided by the original length. The shear strain can be defined as either the angular change of an originally right angle (i.e., \alpha) or as the change in length divided by the orthogonal length (i.e., \frac{\Delta x}{y}). For small angles, it's the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K