MHB Calculating sin ( 0.5 arcsinx)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sin
AI Thread Summary
Two different trigonometric identities were used to calculate sin(0.5 arcsinx), resulting in two distinct expressions. The first identity yielded the result $$\frac{x}{\sqrt{2(1+\sqrt{1-x^2})}}$$, while the second gave $$\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(1-\sqrt{1-x^2})}$$. Despite appearing different, further algebraic manipulation shows these expressions are equivalent, although their graphs differ due to the handling of absolute values and domain restrictions. The discussion highlights potential issues with graphing tools like Wolfram Alpha, particularly regarding imaginary numbers and odd roots of negative values. Ultimately, both expressions represent the same mathematical relationship under specific conditions.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
I did this question using two different trig identities, each of which gave me a different answer when I graphed them on Wolfram Alpha.

1. First identity: sinx = 2sin(0.5x)cos(0.5x)
isolating for sin(0.5x):

sin(0.5x) = (sinx) / (2cos(0.5x))

The question wants sin (0.5 arcsinx):

Applying the formula, we get the answer to be
$$\frac{x}{\sqrt{2(1+\sqrt{1-x^2})}}$$

2. Second identity: sin2x = 0.5 (1-cos2x),
or sin20.5x = 0.5(1-cosx)

Applying that formula, we get the answer to be
$$\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(1-\sqrt{1-x^2})}$$

Why are the two answers different? Is my algebra wrong somewhere, or is this an issue of domain or something?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rido12 said:
I did this question using two different trig identities, each of which gave me a different answer when I graphed them on Wolfram Alpha.

1. First identity: sinx = 2sin(0.5x)cos(0.5x)
isolating for sin(0.5x):

sin(0.5x) = (sinx) / (2cos(0.5x))

The question wants sin (0.5 arcsinx):

Applying the formula, we get the answer to be
$$\frac{x}{\sqrt{2(1+\sqrt{1-x^2})}}$$

2. Second identity: sin2x = 0.5 (1-cos2x),
or sin20.5x = 0.5(1-cosx)

Applying that formula, we get the answer to be
$$\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(1-\sqrt{1-x^2})}$$

Why are the two answers different? Is my algebra wrong somewhere, or is this an issue of domain or something?
They are the same
$$\displaystyle \frac{x}{\sqrt{2(1+\sqrt{1-x^2})}}= \frac{x \sqrt{1 -\sqrt{ 1-x^2}}}{\sqrt{2(1+\sqrt{1-x^2})}\sqrt{1 - \sqrt{1-x^2}}}= \frac{ x \sqrt{ 1 - \sqrt{ 1 -x^2 }} }{ \sqrt{ 2 ( 1 - (1 - x^2 ))} }= \sqrt{ \frac{1}{2} ( 1 - \sqrt{1 - x^2 } ) } $$

Note that $ \sqrt{x^2} = \mid x \mid $
 
It has been my experience that W|A does not handle imaginary numbers correctly with respect to graphing or odd roots of real negative values. Try graphing $$y=x^{\frac{1}{3}}$$ and you get garbage for negative values of $x$.
 
Above, I used sin20.5x = 0.5(1-cosx), but isolating $$\sin\left({x}\right) $$would give us |$$\sin\left({x}\right)$$|. And |$$\sin\left({x}\right)$$| is only equal to $$\sin\left({x}\right)$$ on intervals such as $$(0, \pi)$$ and $$(2\pi, 3\pi)$$. Why, then, do they yield the same answer?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top