Calculating Solar Energy Needed for $1000 Worth of Electricity

  • Thread starter Thread starter tkkid12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the solar energy needed for $1000 worth of electricity at a cost of $0.080 per kWh, the total energy required is 12,500 kWh. However, considering the solar-cell's efficiency of 15.5%, the actual energy from the sun needed increases to approximately 80,645 kWh. This conversion is essential to account for the efficiency loss in energy conversion. Additionally, to convert kilowatt hours to joules, multiply by 3.6 million. The final energy requirement is approximately 2.9 x 10^11 joules.
tkkid12
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Electricity Cost Help me :(

Homework Statement


A solar-cell installation that can convert 15.5% of the sun's energy into electricity has been built. The device delivers 1.0kW of power. If it produces energy at a cost of $0.080/kw*h, how much energy must the sun provide to produce $1000.00 worth of energy.

Homework Equations


??

The Attempt at a Solution



? = energy

given: cost of energy = $0.080/kw*h
cost = $1000

equation:

$1000.00 = (energy)($0.080/kw*h)

Sun's Energy = 12.500kwH

I don't know how to do this! Help Please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you got it right; 12.500/12,500kWh of energy.
 
the teacher gives us the answer.

It Is:


8.1*10^4kw*hr
=2.9*10^11 J


I i need help trying to get there.
 
Hrm, 81,000 kW/hr as the answer? Well, either way you need to convert to joules, which I'm guessing the 'relevant equations' section gives you what you need to do. Assuming you were the one that put the question marks, and your sheet doesn't actually say that...
 
Oh, right, you need to divide the 12,500 by 15.5% (meaning divide by 0.155), which gives 80,645kW/hr, or 8.1x10^4kW/hr.

For converting from kilowatt hours to joules;

1kW/hr = (1 kW)(1 hour) = (1000 J/s)(3600 s) = 3.6x10^6J.

So basically multiply kilowatts by 3.6x10^6 and it'll give you joules.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top