Calculating Solid Angle from Light Source: Steradians to Radians?

  • Thread starter Thread starter raisin_raisin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radians
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the solid angle from a light source and its relationship to Snell's law, particularly in the context of refraction near a surface. The original poster is trying to understand how to convert solid angles in steradians to cone angles in radians for use in Snell's law.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore whether solid angles in steradians can be directly used in Snell's law and discuss the implications of cone symmetry on the calculations. There are questions about how to derive the cone angle from the solid angle and the need for careful consideration when dealing with large cone angles.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that if the beam is symmetric, the cone angle can be used with Snell's law, while others caution against directly using the steradian value without converting it to radians. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations regarding the application of Snell's law in this context.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need to determine the half-angle of the cone for accurate application of Snell's law, particularly when the cone angle is large, which may affect the refraction of different edges differently.

raisin_raisin
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I have a light source emitting near a surface and then getting refracted. I have calculated the solid angle leaving the surface of the light I am interested in but need to find what cone this corresponds to from the emitter. Can I just stick half the solid angle into Snell's law equation even though the solid angle is in steradians and then use this answer (which presumably is in radians) as my new solid angle?

Thank you for reading, I hope I have explained what I mean (i.e basically can I use steradians in Snell's law)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the beam is symetric then yes you can just use the cone angle with snell's law then work out the new solid angle from the new cone angle.

If the cone angle is large you might have to take more care since the different edges will be refracted different amounts and you won't have a symetric cone on the output
 
mgb_phys said:
If the beam is symetric then yes you can just use the cone angle with snell's law then work out the new solid angle from the new cone angle.

If the cone angle is large you might have to take more care since the different edges will be refracted different amounts and you won't have a symetric cone on the output

Thank you very much!
 
Uh, but you cannot just use the steradians value as the angle for Snell's Law. You do have to figure out how many radians the half-angle of the cone is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K