Calculating Subsystem B Probability in a Two-System Setup

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nashed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of a subsystem (specifically subsystem B) being in a certain state within a two-system setup. Participants explore the implications of measuring one subsystem on the other, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics and entangled states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to compute the probability of subsystem B being in a specific state when given a composite state of two subsystems.
  • Another participant suggests summing all probabilities of outcomes where the second component is in the desired state, providing an example involving a particle's position probability density.
  • A participant presents a specific example with a two-qubit system and discusses the mathematical approach to find the probability of measuring the second qubit in a particular state.
  • Another participant challenges the previous mathematical approach, arguing that the inner product between the composite state and the single component state is undefined, suggesting the need to project onto the relevant subspace instead.
  • One participant notes that if the subsystems are separate, measuring one does not affect the other, but if they are entangled, the situation changes significantly.
  • A participant expresses familiarity with entanglement but is unsure how to calculate probabilities for subsystems, indicating a need for clarity on summing over states.
  • Another participant advises to focus on the subsystem's state and apply the calculation without considering the other subsystem, mentioning that operators on one system commute with the state of the other.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to approach the calculation of probabilities in the context of entangled versus separate subsystems. There is no consensus on the best method to compute the probabilities, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of dealing with entangled states versus separate systems, and the discussion includes various mathematical formulations that may depend on specific assumptions about the states involved.

nashed
Messages
56
Reaction score
5
This is a rather basic question but I seem to be stuck, given a system made up of two subsystems how do I compute the probability of subsystem B to be in some state (for example I've got |p>=|a>|b> if I measure the second part what's the probability of it being found in state |c>, how am I supposed to deal with |a>?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nashed said:
for example I've got |p>=|a>|b> if I measure the second part what's the probability of it being found in state |c>, how am I supposed to deal with |a>?
The blunt answer, disregarding of whether or not the system is of fermionic or bosonic, is to sum all probabilities of the outcome in which the second component is ##|c\rangle## from your measurement.
A simple example is finding the probability of a particle to be found in a region ##c<z<c+\Delta z## where ##\Delta z## is very small, if the probability associated with this particle is denoted as ##\rho(x,y,z)##, then you would want to calculate ##\Delta z \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \rho(x,z,c) \ dx\ dy##.
 
Last edited:
just to make sure, if I've got a system of 2 qubits (let's say ## |\psi \rangle = \frac 1 \sqrt(2) (|00\rangle + |11\rangle ) ## ) and I want to check what's the probability of measuring the second qubit to be a ## |0\rangle ## I"ll be checking $$ \langle \psi | \sum_i |i\rangle\langle i| \otimes |0\rangle\langle 0| |\psi \rangle $$
and then I"ll have $$ \sum_i |i\rangle\langle i| = I $$ so I get $$ \langle \psi | I \otimes |0\rangle\langle 0| |\psi \rangle $$
 
nashed said:
just to make sure, if I've got a system of 2 qubits (let's say ## |\psi \rangle = \frac 1 \sqrt(2) (|00\rangle + |11\rangle ) ## ) and I want to check what's the probability of measuring the second qubit to be a ## |0\rangle ## I"ll be checking $$ \langle \psi | \sum_i |i\rangle\langle i| \otimes |0\rangle\langle 0| |\psi \rangle $$
and then I"ll have $$ \sum_i |i\rangle\langle i| = I $$ so I get $$ \langle \psi | I \otimes |0\rangle\langle 0| |\psi \rangle $$
That doesn't look right to me. ##|\psi\rangle## is a composite state while either ##|0\rangle## or ##|1\rangle## is just one component of the whole system, the scalar inner product between them is undefined. You will need to project ##|\psi\rangle## to the subspace where the second bit iz ##|0\rangle## and calculate the norm of resulting state.
 
nashed said:
This is a rather basic question but I seem to be stuck, given a system made up of two subsystems how do I compute the probability of subsystem B to be in some state (for example I've got |p>=|a>|b> if I measure the second part what's the probability of it being found in state |c>, how am I supposed to deal with |a>?)

From the state its easily seen they are separate systems. Measuring one has no effect on the other. Now if they were entangled that is another matter, but the subject for another thread to explain what entanglement is and what's going on. The short answer is if entangled they are in a mixed state when observing just one system - but like I said requires its own thread. I have posted the math of it before and will need to dig it up which can take a while.

Thanks
Bill
 
I actually know what entanglement is, my main problem is that I'm used to working with operators on the whole system so when I was told that I need to calculate a probability on a subsystem I was taken aback.

My thought process is that I should sum over all possible states for the first part of the system, only I have no idea how to do that.
 
nashed said:
My thought process is that I should sum over all possible states for the first part of the system, only I have no idea how to do that.

Simply apply it to the state of the sub-system - forget the other system.

Technically it lies in the combined vector space of the two systems but operators on one system commutes with state of the other - it's the identity operator.

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
8K