Calculating Tensile Stress in a 40mm Rod with 200 KN Load | Formulas & Solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The tensile stress in a 40 mm diameter rod subjected to a 200 kN load is calculated to be 159.24 N/mm² using the formula tensile stress = force/area, where the area is derived from the equation πr². The calculation was performed with a cross-sectional area of 1256 mm². While the result appears accurate for coursework, it is essential to consider the implications of significant figures and the Poisson effect, which indicates that the actual stress may be higher due to the reduction in cross-sectional area under tensile loading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile stress calculations
  • Familiarity with the formula for cross-sectional area (πr²)
  • Knowledge of significant figures in engineering calculations
  • Awareness of the Poisson effect in materials science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Poisson effect and its implications on tensile stress
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in engineering calculations
  • Explore advanced tensile stress analysis techniques
  • Study the properties of materials under tensile loading
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, materials scientists, and professionals involved in structural analysis and design will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on tensile stress calculations and material behavior under load.

rad10k
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the tensile stress in a rod 40 mm in diameter with a load 200 KN ?


Homework Equations



pi*r^2



The Attempt at a Solution



3.14 * (20*20) = 1256 mm^2

200 * 1000 = 200 000 N

200 000 / 1256 = 159.24 N/mm^2

Tensile stress = 159.24 N/mm^2

Could anybody tell if this is correct and offer some guidance if its not? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just to add I am using tensile stress = f/a
 
Looks good to me!
 
Thansk :o)
 
Comment: ridiculously "accurate" for practical purposes. Even 159 N/mm2 is slightly incredulous.
 
Not sure what you mean by that but its for course work not pratical purposes.
 
I just think that you should contemplate the meaning of what you have calculated. If you asked me what was the temperature in my room right now, and I replied that it was 15.36 degrees celsius, you would perhaps consider that the 6 was unnecessary, and possibly also the 3. There are a number of things that could be said about stress. One of them is that, under tensile stress the cross-sectional area gets smaller due to the Poisson effect (Like you see when you stretch a rubber band, and it gets thinner as well as longer). So the actual stress is bigger than you have calculated (although, admittedly, the people who define standards don't ask that people do recalculate the stress). But if you did, you would see how at least the last figure would change. I would challenge you also to say why you thought that 5 significant figures was the "correct" truncation of your result. Why not 7 or 3 or some other number. You can't answer that without asking other questions, such as "why do you want to know?". My plea is that you should not regard coursework as something to be finished, but rather some spur to getting more meaning out of it. Please think about the meaning of any calculation you do, and then choose an appropriate accuracy.
 
I can see your point I shall think about that when answering question in future . Though I don't want to hand some work in and then get the answer wrong because I rounded it too far .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
24K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K