Calculating Tension in a Wire Rope: Transverse Displacement and Applied Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter holezch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in a wire rope subjected to a transverse force applied by a sailor. The key formula derived is T = N L/s, where T is the tension, N is the applied force, L is the distance from the lower end of the rope, and s is the transverse displacement. Participants explore the relationship between the forces and the geometry of the situation, emphasizing that for small angles, the sine of the angle approximates the angle itself (sinθ ≈ θ). The conversation also touches on the nature of right triangles formed by the tension and applied force, clarifying that the tension remains consistent along the rope despite the displacement. Overall, the discussion highlights the principles of vector relationships and geometry in understanding tension in the wire rope system.
holezch
Messages
251
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sailor tests the tension in a wire rope holding up a mast by pushing against the rope with his hand at a distance L from the lower end of the rope. When he exerts a 'transverse' push N, the rope suffers a transverse displacement s.

Show that for s << L, the tension in the wire rope is given approximately by the formula:

T = N L/s




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I looked up the word transverse and it meant to be perpendicular. So, then we have that the tension vector, and the displacement vector and another side make a right angle triangle. Then, T is the hypotenuse of the triangle displacement^2 + another side^2.. I know that if I can get a proper sine or cosine equation, I can use the opp/hyp identities to come to that solution, but I can't see it.. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since s << L, tanθ~ sinθ ~ θ = s/L.
So F/T = sinθ = s/L
 
hi, thank you very much, but how is sin theta = F/T? the displacement s would form a right angle triangle with L and where the rope used to be before it was displaced. the applied force could be of varying magnitudes so we can't say that it's the same as S?

thanks
 
or maybe when theta is really small, both triangles formed by N and T and L and S are approximately the same? thanks
 
holezch said:
or maybe when theta is really small, both triangles formed by N and T and L and S are approximately the same? thanks
Yes. In a triangle formed by the forces, sides of the triangles are proportional to the corresponding forces.
 
thanks! that;s what I thought intuitively.. but how can I show this?

thanks again
 
holezch said:
thanks! that;s what I thought intuitively.. but how can I show this?

thanks again
It is a theorem in the vectors. No need to prove it here.
 
rl.bhat said:
It is a theorem in the vectors. No need to prove it here.

thanks, do you know where I can learn about this theorem? I had no idea about it.. and is it a theorem involving vectors in PHYSICS or vectors in general? it seems to rely on the physics behind this question. (that the force vectors will be proportional to the sides L and S) thanks again
 
could anybody tell me about this please?
thanks
 
  • #10
Original position of the rope, transverse force and the tension in the rope firm a right angled triangle. In that
F/T = sinθ.
When s <<< L, sinθ = θ. And θ = s/L.
So F/T = s/L.
 
  • #11
thanks, but how do you know that F/T = sin theta?? what if the applied force vector is longer than the tension, then it would have to be scaled..
 
  • #12
holezch said:
thanks, but how do you know that F/T = sin theta?? what if the applied force vector is longer than the tension, then it would have to be scaled..
When you apply transverse force in the horizontal direction, the vertical rope is shifted sideways having a tension T. Draw the diagram and find sinθ.
 
  • #13
yes, I understand, but how do we know that these vectors (the applied force and the tension) will make a right angle triangle with the rope position before the force was applied?

For example, the tension vector might be "too long", and only part of this vector will be included in the triangle.. I hope you understand what I'm asking.. thanks
 
  • #14
Can you draw a figure as described in the problem?
I presume the rope is straight before applying the transverse force. Even if the tension vector is "too long", the tension is same through out the rope.
 
  • #15
hi,
72zj1u.jpg

I also drew in what I understand from this problem.. there's the triangle, and the lengths in red should form a right angle triangle.
the broken line is where it is before being pushed. thanks

I was asking about how we knew that N, T and the broken red line part formed a "proper" right angle triangle? what if a right angle triangle is only formed with N, the red broken line part and a part of T (3/4? 1/2?. et c), then sin theta wouldn't be N/T
 
  • #16
If N is the force of push, the vector N should be from broken line to full line. The broken line, N and T form a right angled triangle. Angle between the N and the broken line is 90 degrees.
 
  • #17
hmm, that's what I thought when I first saw it.. but how do I know the length of N is s and the length of T is L? Isn't it possible that you would need more force to move displacement s than a magnitude of s? same with tension..

thanks
 
  • #18
Since two ends of the ropes are fixed, the change in the length of the rope is very minimum. When you push more, θ increases and hence s increases. T also increases, but L does not change. There must be a braking point for the rope. So you have restrict your N.
 
Back
Top