Calculating the Electric field at a point due to a ring of charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at a point due to a ring of charge. It is established that one cannot simplify the problem by treating a circular charge distribution as a linear charge distribution, as the distances from the point of interest to the charge elements differ. The Biot-Savart law is referenced for calculating the magnetic field at the center of a current-carrying ring, emphasizing the need for precise geometric considerations. The symmetry of the charge distribution indicates that the electric field at the center of a uniformly charged ring is indeed zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart law
  • Knowledge of Gauss's law
  • Basic concepts of symmetry in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's law in various charge configurations
  • Learn about the Biot-Savart law and its applications in electromagnetism
  • Explore electric field calculations for different geometries, including rings and spheres
  • Investigate the implications of symmetry in electric and magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and magnetostatics, particularly in relation to charge distributions and fields.

Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4
I don't know if this is the correct section. It is not exactly a homework problem, but here it is:

If I were given a circle of charge with radius r and were asked to find the electric field due to this circle of charge at the center of the circle, would it be valid to do the following:

Since I know the radius of the circle of charge, could I imagine the circle of charge to be a line of charge, and the point in question be r away. That is, find the circumference of the circle, as if I were stretching out the circle into a straight line of length equal to the circumference of the circle. Then, I could calculate the electric field due to the line of charge at a distance equal to the radius of the circle.

Is this valid to do? I am sure there would be an easier way to solve this problem, but just out of curiosity, would this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yosty22 said:
Is this valid to do? I am sure there would be an easier way to solve this problem, but just out of curiosity, would this work?
I don't think it would be valid. In the case of a circular source of charge with the centre of the circle at point P, all the charge elements are at a distance r away. If instead you keep P fixed, but put a horizontal line of charge a distance r away, not all the charge elements (or points on that line) will be at a distance r from P.
 

Attachments

  • Img1.png
    Img1.png
    1 KB · Views: 556
Ok, that makes sense. What about if it was a ring with constant current through it and you were looking for the b field at the center. Would it work in this case?
 
Yosty22 said:
Ok, that makes sense. What about if it was a ring with constant current through it and you were looking for the b field at the center. Would it work in this case?
No, for the same reason, the current elements are not all the same distance from the point of interest. Using the Biot-Savart law, you can derive explicit expressions for the B field at the centre of the loop from a circular current flow and that from a wire.
 
Just apply Gauss's law and you're ready to go.

The scenario you described corresponds to a closed surface. Therefore, you need the area of the circle, not it's perimeter.
 
Shouldn't the electric field at the center of the circle be zero as a result of the symmetry of the geometry. Which direction would you think the electric field vector at the center of the circle would be pointing?

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
8K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K