Calculating the frequency of a photon

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Photon
AI Thread Summary
The frequency of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is typically derived from its wavelength using instruments like spectroscopes, which utilize diffraction grating. Direct measurement of a single photon’s frequency is impossible; instead, multiple photons must interact with measuring devices to track the frequency of the EM wave. In the infrared range, current electronics cannot measure frequency directly due to high oscillation rates. At facilities like the LHC, the energy of gamma rays from electron-positron annihilation is inferred from the energy deposited in detectors, rather than directly measuring wavelength. Overall, precise wavelength measurement is achieved using spectrographs that separate different wavelengths.
bobie
Gold Member
Messages
720
Reaction score
2
Hi,
I've read that the frequency of EMR is found by means of a spectroscope , which uses diffraction grating and that it is derived indirectly from its wavelength. Is that true?

Is there a way, an instrument that count directly the frequency of a photon or a y-ray? and up to what frquency? Is it possible to verify that the frquency of a γ-ray resulting from the annihilation of an electron is 1.2356 x 10^20 Hz (511.000 eV)?
Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Once we get into the IR range, we lose the ability to directly measure the frequency of the EM wave. Current electronics simply can't operate fast enough. Instead, we can measure the energy of the interaction, separate the incoming light into a spectrum, and a few other things to get the frequency/wavelength indirectly.

Edit: I feel I should also mention that it is impossible to directly measure the frequency of a single photon. A photon is a single event, whereas we need multiple photons to interact with our measuring devices to be able to track the frequency of the EM wave. If we observe a radio wave over time we are seeing millions and millions of photons per second, each one carrying a small piece of information about the wave.
 
Here is a useful calculator:

Electromagnetic Frequency, Wavelength and Energy Ultra Calculator

http://www.1728.org/freqwave.htm
 
Drakkith said:
Once we get into the IR range, we lose the ability to directly measure the frequency of the EM wave.
Edit: I feel I should also mention that it is impossible to directly measure the frequency of a single photon.
Thanks, Drakkith, but are you able to measure the oscillations in presence of a coherent laser beam of visible light? And how do you measure wave length with precision?

So, at LHC they measure the energy of the y-ray from e-/e+ annihilation only measuring its wavelength? how precise can it be?
 
bobie said:
Thanks, Drakkith, but are you able to measure the oscillations in presence of a coherent laser beam of visible light?

No, visible light oscillates at too high a frequency for electronics to follow.

And how do you measure wave length with precision?

A spectrograph can do this by separating the different wavelengths.

So, at LHC they measure the energy of the y-ray from e-/e+ annihilation only measuring its wavelength? how precise can it be?

They don't measure its wavelength. The wavelength is inferred based on how much energy the gamma ray gives to the detectors upon absorption. At least that's how I think it works. I'm not up to speed on high energy particle physics.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top