Calculating the heat in the circuit when adding resistances

  • Thread starter Thread starter satycorn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Heat
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
satycorn
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone! I've got to problems I need your help with, I would really appreciate it if you could help me.

1. Homework Statement

A conductor made out of copper (Cu) has a resistance of 4Ω in 20° celsius. When current flows in the conductor, it's temperature rises to 220°C. In parallel with the resistance, we connect a Rx resistance. How should the value of the Rx resistance be, compared to the original resistance, so that a greater heat can be released in the Rx? For Copper: α=0.0039, ρo=1.7x10-8

Homework Equations


Q=I2Rt; Q=(U2/R)t




The Attempt at a Solution



So since the resistances are connected in parallel, I tried using the first one but I don't have the time, do I have to build the solution in form of a ratio?? And also, why do we need the ρo of Copper if the R=Ro(1+αΔt) formula is used, in my opinion? Can anyone please help me with this?

Thank you :)!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ughh, thanks for your reply, although I think I'm stuck again...

I separated R from the Q=I2Rt, which gives R=Q/(I2xt).
I treat the two resistances as a rate (Rx/R), which is Rx=Q1/(I2xt) and R=Q/(I2xt) but here's where I'm stuck, the problem doesn't ask for a specific heat, it just says: "So that the heat that would be released in Rx can be greater"... What do I do here? Do I just continue solving the rate, going to another rate of R=Ro(1+αΔt)? Wouldn't that give the same in both parts of the refraction??
 
The answer will be in the form of an inequality. Rather than using <, >, and running the risk of getting them reversed somewhere, probably simplest to calculate the resistance that would make them equal, then figure out how to write the inequality.
 
haruspex said:
The answer will be in the form of an inequality. Rather than using <, >, and running the risk of getting them reversed somewhere, probably simplest to calculate the resistance that would make them equal, then figure out how to write the inequality.

Should I calculate the resistance from R=Ro(1+αΔt) or R=Q/(I2xt)?

Either way the symbols just cancel themselves and I am stuck with unknown ones again...
Q/(I2xt)=Q'/(I2xt). The current and time are constant, right? So they cancel themselves and I end up with Q=Q'... Same thing goes for the other formula...

So if I do it in form of an equation from the formula of heat: Q=I2xRxt, it will be:
Q'>Q -> I2xR'xt>I2xRxt, the I and t cancel themselves, so R'>R, I'm left with that, is that really it, to get a higher heat I need a higher resistance, so Rx has to be higher? It just sounds too easy :S..
 
Okay, I understand. Is this okay?

Ro'(1+αΔt)>Ro(1+αΔt)
Ro'x1,78>4x1,78
Ro'>4

I don't know how accurate I am, but the problem is asking me for the Rx resistance, which I haven't found, right?...