Calculating the Height of a Flowerpot in Free Fall: A Kinematics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter murphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around solving a kinematics problem involving a flowerpot in free fall, observed by a cat. The pot is visible for 0.50 seconds as it travels 2.00 meters past a window, and the goal is to determine how high it ascends above the window. It is established that the pot's trajectory is symmetrical, taking 0.25 seconds to rise and 0.25 seconds to fall, confirming that the time to ascend equals the time to descend. Participants emphasize the importance of using the falling body equations to simplify calculations. The final answer for the height above the window is determined to be 2.34 meters.
murphy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The Drowsy Cat - Kinematics!

Can anybody help me get started? I have been working on this problem forever...
A drowsy cat spots a flowerpot that sails first up and then down past an open window. The pot is in view for a total of 0.50s and the top to bottom height of the window is 2.00m. How high above the window does the flowerpot go? The answer is 2.34m but I don't know how to get it, I know that it is a kinematics free fall question but I keep getting too many variables. If anyone knows how to go about answering this, that would be awesome! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pot's arc will be symmetrical, that means it will take exactly half the time (0.25 seconds) to travel upwards the 2m. (The second half of the pot's trajectory is irrelevant.) Does that simplify things?
 
Yes! Thank you very much. So in these problems, then, can you always assume that the time to go up = the time to come back down? (assuming an ideal free fall situation)
 
For an object thrown from the ground, its velocity on the way down will be equal in magnitude but opposite in direction then at the same height on the way up. So yes it will take the same amount of time to pass the window going going up as going down.

If you set up the falling body equation of motion with t=0 and x=0 at the bottom of the window it works out nicly.
 
My stars & garters - I helped someone! :-)
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top