Calculating the Kinetic Energy of a Meteor: What Factors Influence its Velocity?

AI Thread Summary
The kinetic energy of a meteor can be calculated using the formula E=1/2 mv², where m is the mass and v is the velocity relative to Earth. Typical meteor velocities range from 10 to 30 km/s, with the minimum velocity being around 11 km/s, which corresponds to Earth's escape velocity. Objects from the outer solar system can achieve higher speeds, potentially up to 75 km/s, though this is rare. The relative velocity of meteors can be influenced by their orbital paths, with comets exhibiting varying speeds based on their prograde or retrograde orbits. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately determining a meteor's kinetic energy.
Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
How can I calculate kinetic energy of a meteor? On what variables it depends?

Thanks and sorry for my bad English.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You can use the usual formula for kinetic energy: ##E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2## with the mass m and the velocity v (relative to earth). Typical velocities are 10 to 30 km/s.
 
I thought meteors were faster. :smile:
 
Well, ~11km/s is the minimal velocity, and corresponds to the escape velocity of earth. ~30km/s is the orbital velocity of earth, but most objects nearby have similar orbits, so their relative velocity is lower. Objects from the outer solar system can have higher relative velocities, up to ~75km/s should be possible (but really rare). To get even more speed, you need objects not bound to the solar system.
 
tade said:
I thought meteors were faster. :smile:
30 kms/second is pretty damn fast. That would get them from space to ground in about 3 seconds, if they came in vertically and were not slowed by air resistance.
 
as mbf said 'relative velocity' . comets can have either a prograde or retrograde orbit. so the approach speed of a retrograde is going to be pretty high...
also taking into account keplers second(?) law ...the comet will be most likely at its perihelion when approaching the Sun and so will have an increased speed.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top