Calculating the Maximum Height of a Helium Balloon

  • Thread starter Thread starter heyhey1233
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon Rise
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height a helium balloon can rise, considering its mass, volume, and the mass density of the attached rope. Participants clarify that the balloon's volume is not constant as it ascends, which affects buoyancy. The balloon will stop rising when the density of helium inside equals the density of the surrounding air, which decreases with height. The calculations involve using the barometric formula for air density and the ideal gas law for helium to determine buoyancy forces. Final equilibrium occurs when the sum of forces acting on the balloon is zero, factoring in the weight of the rope and the changing conditions as the balloon rises.
heyhey1233
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The Helium balloon of total mass=0.200kg and volume 1.00M^3 is attached a a rope with mass density of 1.00g/m. How high will the balloon rise?

I know that air density is 1.204kg/m^3 and that the balloon will stop rising after the density on the inside equals the density on the outside.

I tried calculated that the density of Helium inside the balloon would be .1797g/L, but I am unsure how to calculate when it would reach a height of 1.204kg/m^3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the balloon will stop rising after the density on the inside equals the density on the outside.
Not exactly, because the rope pulls the balloon downwards. Does your balloon change volume when rising (normal case), or is the volume supposed to be constant?
 
Does your balloon change volume when rising (normal case), or is the volume supposed to be constant?

The volume is not constant.
 
Last edited:
heyhey1233 said:
The volume is constant.

Thanks for clarifying that the rope pulls it down!

would be interesting to see what your balloon is made of that the volume remains constant as it rises ;)

Dave
 
If the volume of the balloon and the density of air did not change with height, one could hang up 1004 g of weight to the balloon -> then 1004 g + 200 g will balance the buoyant force on 1 m^3 large balloon. This means the rope could be 1 km long (1004 m).

However, the density of air and the volume of the balloon will change with height, so the actual height of the balloon may be slightly different than the above crude estimate.

The balloon will expand, which could increase the buoyancy, but the density of air will decrease, which has the opposite effect. If you want to go into that, here is some help:

For density of air, one can use the (as always, approximate) barometric formula

<br /> \rho(h) = \rho_0 e^{-\frac{M_a gh}{RT}}.<br />

where M_a = 28 g/mol is approx. the molar mass of the air (mostly nitrogen) and R = 8.3 J/mol is the gas constant.

The volume of the balloon V can be estimated from the equation of state for helium gas
<br /> PV = m_{\mathrm He}/M_{\mathrm He} R T<br />

where M_{\mathrm He} = 4 g/mol. The pressure P inside the balloon can be approximated by the atmospheric pressure at height h:

<br /> P\approx p_a(h) = p_0 e^{-\frac{M_agh}{RT}}.<br />

With this, you can find out the buoyancy force

<br /> F_B(h) = \rho(h) V(h) g<br />

You have to find also how the force due to rope depend on the height (linear in h); the force of weight is constant = mg.

The balloon will be in final equilibrium when the sum of forces is zero.
 
davenn said:
would be interesting to see what your balloon is made of that the volume remains constant as it rises ;)
Mylar? Plenty of Mylar balloons, and they hold volume pretty well.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
174
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top