Calculating the norm of linear, continuous operator

mahler1
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement .

Let ##X=\{f \in C[0,1]: f(1)=0\}## with the ##\|x\|_{\infty}## norm. Let ##\phi \in X## and let ##T_{\phi}:X \to X## given by

##T_{\phi}f(x)=f(x)\phi(x)##.
Prove that ##T## is a linear continuous operator and calculate its norm.

The attempt at a solution.

To check for linearity is pretty simple, for continuity I am not so sure if my proof is correct so I write it just in case:

##T## is continuous if and only if ##T## is bounded. So, I want to prove that there exists ##c>0: \forall f \in X##, ##\|T(f)\|_{\infty}\leq c\|f\|_{\infty}##. ##\|T(f)\|_{\infty}=sup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)\phi(x)|\leq sup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)|sup_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|##. As ##[0,1]## is compact, ##sup_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|=max_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|##, if I call ##c=max_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|##, then ##sup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)\phi(x)|\leq csup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)|## for every ##f \in X##. It follows that ##T## is bounded ##\implies## ##T## is continuous.

Now, I had problems to calculate the norm of this operator. One of the definition for the norm in the space of linear, continuous operators is ##||T||=inf\{M: \|T(f)\|_{\infty}\leq M\|f\|_{\infty}\}## (among other equivalent definitions). Sorry if I say something trivially false but I think that ##c=max_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|## is the norm. I have to prove that ##c## is a lower bound of the set ##\{M: \|T(f)\|_{\infty}\leq M\|f\|_{\infty}\}## and that it is the upper lower bound.

Here's a tentative solutions after the suggestions:
Lets show that ##c=max_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|## is a lower bound of the set ##A=\{M: \|T(f)\|_{\infty}\leq M\|f\|_{\infty}\}##. Let ##M \in A##, then ##\|T(\phi)\|_{\infty}\leq M \|\phi\|_{\infty}##. So ##c^2=sup_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)\phi(x)| \leq Mc \implies c\leq M##. This means that ##c## is a lower bound of ##A##, but ##sup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)\phi(x)|\leq csup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)|## for every ##f \in X##, so ##c \in A##. It follows that ##||T||=inf\{M: \|T(f)\|_{\infty}\leq M\|f\|_{\infty}\}=c##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the norm of ##T_\phi (\phi)##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
mahler1 said:
Homework Statement .

Let ##X=\{f \in C[0,1]: f(1)=0\}## with the ##\|x\|_{\infty}## norm. Let ##\phi \in X## and let ##T_{\phi}:X \to X## given by

##T_{\phi}f(x)=f(x)\phi(x)##.
Prove that ##T## is a linear continuous operator and calculate its norm.

The attempt at a solution.

To check for linearity is pretty simple, for continuity I am not so sure if my proof is correct so I write it just in case:

##T## is continuous if and only if ##T## is bounded. So, I want to prove that there exists ##c>0: \forall f \in X##, ##\|T(f)\|_{\infty}\leq c\|f\|_{\infty}##. ##\|T(f)\|_{\infty}=sup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)\phi(x)|=sup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)|sup_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|##. As ##X## is compact, ##sup_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|=max_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|##, if I call ##c=max_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|##, then ##sup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)\phi(x)|\leq csup_{x \in [0,1]}|f(x)|## for every ##f \in X##. It follows that ##T## is bounded ##\implies## ##T## is continuous.

Now, I had problems to calculate the norm of this operator. One of the definition for the norm in the space of linear, continuous operators is ##||T||=inf\{M: \|T(f)\|_{\infty}\leq M\|f\|_{\infty}\}## (among other equivalent definitions). Sorry if I say something trivially false but I think that ##c=max_{x \in [0,1]}|\phi(x)|## is the norm. I have to prove that ##c## is a lower bound of the set ##\{M: \|T(f)\|_{\infty}\leq M\|f\|_{\infty}\}## and that it is the upper lower bound.

I've never used the fact that every function ##f## in ##X## satisfies ##f(1)=0##, maybe I have to use that in this part of the exercise. Suppose ##\phi## is not the zero function (if not, ##T## would be the zero operator and by properties of the norm,##||T||=0##), ##\phi(1)=0## and there is ##x \in [0,1]: \phi(x)≠0##.

I think your proof has a lot of the right ideas in it. But it's really unclear. And it does contain false statements. ##sup |f \phi| \le sup |f| sup |\phi|##. They aren't equal. And X isn't compact. [0,1] is compact. And LCKurtz has a great hint. And I don't think f(1)=0 has much to do with this part of the exercise. Can you rearrange the whole thing and try again?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
LCKurtz said:
Look at the norm of ##T_\phi (\phi)##.

It really helped that hint, thanks!
 
Dick said:
I think your proof has a lot of the right ideas in it. But it's really unclear. And it does contain false statements. ##sup |f \phi| \le sup |f| sup |\phi|##. They aren't equal. And X isn't compact. [0,1] is compact. And LCKurtz has a great hint. And I don't think f(1)=0 has much to do with this part of the exercise. Can you rearrange the whole thing and try again?

I meant ##[0,1]##, no idea why I wrote ##X##. If the elements of two sets ##A## and ##B## consist of non-negative elements, are you sure that ##sup AB \leq sup A sup B## and not always equal? I'll think about a counterexample to convince myself. In the last part of the exercise I've used that if the elements of ##A## are non-negative numbers, then ##supAA=supAsupA##.
 
mahler1 said:
I meant ##[0,1]##, no idea why I wrote ##X##. If the elements of two sets ##A## and ##B## consist of non-negative elements, are you sure that ##sup AB \leq sup A sup B## and not always equal? I'll think about a counterexample to convince myself. In the last part of the exercise I've used that if the elements of ##A## are non-negative numbers, then ##supAA=supAsupA##.

I'm absolutely sure. Try f(x)=1-x and g(x)=(1-x)*x. And you are dealing with sup|f|, it doesn't much matter whether anything is nonnegative or not.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top