I Calculating the odds of drawing 3 "no" notes from a hat with 3 "no" and 3 "yes" notes

AI Thread Summary
The probability of drawing three "no" notes consecutively from a hat containing three "no" and three "yes" notes is calculated as 1/20 for one person. When both individuals draw three "no" notes in succession, the combined probability becomes 1/400. The discussion highlights the surprising nature of this outcome, suggesting that the perceived significance of the event may overshadow the mathematical odds. Participants express amazement at the result, emphasizing the emotional impact rather than just the statistical analysis. Overall, the probability calculation provides a clear understanding of the odds involved in this scenario.
Forwardbite1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
My wife and I would like to know what the odds are of a "hat draw" we did this past week.
Hello All,

I would like to find out what the percentage is of what happened to us in a drawing - quite amazing and would like to know what the percentage is in doing this.

My wife and I were looking into starting another business but it looked like we were getting roadblocked at every turn. My wife had an idea and thought we should draw out of a hat to let us know if we were to go ahead with this new business by her and I drawing the same answer in each of our (3) draws - (6) draws total.

She put (3) pieces of paper in a hat that had "yes" on them, and she put (3) pieces of paper in the hat that had "no" on them.

My wife drew (3) times and got "no" on all (3) draws.

**Keep in mind that after each of her (3) draws, the piece of paper she drew was NOT put back into the hat. It was set aside on the counter. In other words, prior to her first draw, there were (3) "yes" pieces of paper and (3) "no" pieces of paper in the hat. After her first draw there were (3) "yes" pieces of paper and only (2) "no" pieces of paper in the hat. After her second draw there were (3) "yes" pieces of paper and only (1) "no" piece of paper in the hat. When I drew, I used the same method of setting the piece of paper that I drew to the side before doing my next draw.

My wife drew (3) "no" pieces of paper. The (3) "no" pieces of paper were then put back in the hat and I then I also drew (3) "no" pieces of paper, while also using the same method of setting aside the drawn piece of paper on the counter and not back in the hat. Each draw having varying odds since the drawn piece of paper was not put back in the hat. Also, not sure if this would be somehow calculated, but we did also draw (6) "no" in a row.

Could someone please calculate what the percentage is of this happening? I hope I've provided enough info for someone (someone much better at math than me! Ha!), but feel free to let me know if any additional info is needed for this calc..

Thank You!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not a whit, we defy augury. Hamlet

The probability of drawing all three "no" is ##\frac 3 6 \times \frac 2 5 \times \frac 1 4 = \frac 1 {20}##. The probability of both doing it is, therefore, ##\frac 1 {400}##.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Albertus Magnus, FactChecker and berkeman
One important thing to note for statistical purposes, you would be here making the same thread and asking the same question if you both got all yesses so I think PeroK's answer, while correct, underestimates the important thing which is the probability that you are amazed by what happened and think it has cosmic meaning.
 
We got the answer we were looking for (1/400), and thank you for providing this answer.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top