Calculating the Radius of Curvature for a Deflected Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jerry1989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Geometry
Jerry1989
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

I'm stuck with this problem, we want to compare the curve of a beam to it's horziontal deflection, it's for an experiment we're performing on a very elastic beam.

In the attachment you see a flexibel beam getting deflected by a force, this causes displacement x. We don't know (or can't measure) displacement in vertical y-direction.
However, we can assume the beam bends in a way that it's curvature resembles a circle with radius R.

Now, if we have an L0 of 120mm and an X-displacement of 55mm. What would that radius R be?

So far, I've tried an arc-length menthod, and I tried looking at the circles, but I just can't figure it out. Can you guys help me out?
 

Attachments

  • Knipsel.JPG
    Knipsel.JPG
    12.8 KB · Views: 489
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Most beam theories which are used in structural analysis are what are known as 'small deflection' theories. Because of the mathematics involved with relating the bending moment in the beam to its curvature, a great simplification in calculating the deflection of the beam is obtained when the slope of the beam is very small. For very flexible beams, where the slopes can no longer be considered small, the 'small deflection' theories can no longer be applied, and more complicated 'large deflection' theories must be used for analysis.

What you are looking for is called 'elastica theory':

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastica_theory

For obvious reasons, most structural engineers don't deal with such theories, but some engineers, like those involved in laying submarine pipelines, may be familiar with the necessary mathematics.
 
thanks, I'm looking into it.
So far, it's looking t be more of a trigonometry problem. But a tricky one..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top