Calculating the radius of curvature given acceleration and velocity

In summary: The answer I was looking for was an actual equation, namely: $$\mathbf{i_t}=\frac{\frac{dr}{dt}\mathbf{i_r}+r\frac{d\theta}{dt}\mathbf{i_{\theta}}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{dr}{dt}\right)^2+\left(r\frac{d\theta}{dt}\right)^2}}$$Does this make sense to you?Yes, I think so.
  • #1
Like Tony Stark
179
6
Homework Statement
A particle moves in a plane trajectory such that its polar coordinates depend on time according to ##r=0.833t^3+5t## and ##\theta=0.3t^2## where ##r## is measured in ##cm##, ##\theta## in ##rad## and ##t## in seconds. Determine the magnitude of the velocity and acceleration and the radius of curvature at ##t=2##.
Relevant Equations
##a_n=\frac{v^2}{\rho}##
Well, what I've done so far is calculating the magnitude of velocity and acceleration replacing ##t=2## in ##\theta (t)## and ##r(t)## so I could get the expressions for ##\dot r##, ##\dot \theta##, ##\ddot r## and ##\ddot \theta##. But that's not my problem... my problem is related to the radius of curvature... how can I do it? In previous exercises where I was given an image of the situation I wrote the acceleration (written in terms of radius and theta) in terms of the tangent and normal vector so that I had the normal acceleration and I could use ##a_n=\frac{v^2}{\rho}##, but now I don't have any image to know how to decompose the acceleration in the normal and tangent components.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It might help to think about the relationship between the direction of the velocity vector and the direction of the normal vector.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #3
How is the radius of curvature related to the rate of change in the unit vector in the velocity vector with distance along the trajectory?
 
  • #4
TSny said:
It might help to think about the relationship between the direction of the velocity vector and the direction of the normal vector.
Yes, I know that they're perpendicular. But what can I do with that? I mean, I know the angles formed by the velocity and the polar axis so I also know the angles formed by the normal acceleration and the polar axis. But I don't know the normal acceleration module and I don't know any of its component
 
  • #5
If the velocity vector is $$\mathbf{v}=\frac{dr}{dt}\mathbf{i_r}+r\frac{d\theta}{dt}\mathbf{i_{\theta}}$$what is the unit vector in the tangential direction (i.e., tangent to the particle trajectory) ##\mathbf{i_t}## equal to?
 
  • #6
Chestermiller said:
How is the radius of curvature related to the rate of change in the unit vector in the velocity vector with distance along the trajectory?
Yes, I know that they're perpendicular. But what can I do with that? I mean, I know the angles formed by the velocity and the polar axis so I also know the angles formed by the normal acceleration and the polar axis. But I don't know the normal acceleration module and I don't know any of its component
 
  • #7
Like Tony Stark said:
Yes, I know that they're perpendicular. But what can I do with that? I mean, I know the angles formed by the velocity and the polar axis so I also know the angles formed by the normal acceleration and the polar axis. But I don't know the normal acceleration module and I don't know any of its component
Please answer my question in post #5.
 
  • #8
Chestermiller said:
Please answer my question in post #5.
Sorry, I hadn't seen it
 
  • #9
Like Tony Stark said:
Sorry, I hadn't seen it
OK. So now that you've seen it, what is your answer?
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
If the velocity vector is $$\mathbf{v}=\frac{dr}{dt}\mathbf{i_r}+r\frac{d\theta}{dt}\mathbf{i_{\theta}}$$what is the unit vector in the tangential direction (i.e., tangent to the particle trajectory) ##\mathbf{i_t}## equal to?
The unit vector will have the direction of the velocity and module 1. Moreover, I can calculate ##r.\dot {\theta}## because I have ##v_{\theta}##, can't I?
 
  • #11
Like Tony Stark said:
The unit vector will have the direction of the velocity and module 1. Moreover, I can calculate ##r.\dot {\theta}## because I have ##v_{\theta}##, can't I?
The answer I was looking for was an actual equation, namely:
$$\mathbf{i_t}=\frac{\frac{dr}{dt}\mathbf{i_r}+r\frac{d\theta}{dt}\mathbf{i_{\theta}}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{dr}{dt}\right)^2+\left(r\frac{d\theta}{dt}\right)^2}}$$
Does this make sense to you?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #12
There is an approach where you don't have to calculate the unit tangent and normal vectors. You can prove that the instantaneous radius of curvature is $$\rho(t)=\frac{|\vec{v}|}{|\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\vec{v}}{|\vec{v}|}|}$$ where ##\vec{v}## is the velocity vector and ##|\vec{v}|## its magnitude.
EDIT: Well on second thought $$\frac{\vec{v}}{|\vec{v}|}$$ is the unit tangent vector so we can't avoid that even here...
 
Last edited:
  • #13
There is actually a way to do this avoiding the tangent and normal vectors.
Suppose we know the magnitude of velocity ##|\vec{v}|## and the magnitude of acceleration ##|\vec{a}|## at a specific time ##t_0##

if we can also calculate ##a_T=|\frac{d|\vec{v}|}{dt}|## at time ##t_0## ,which is the magnitude of the tangential acceleration, then the magnitude of the normal acceleration is ##|a_N|=\sqrt{|\vec{a}|^2-|\vec{a_T}|^2}##.

By knowing ##|\vec{v}|## and ##|a_N|## we can calculate the radius of curvature at time ##t_0##.
 
  • #14
Delta2 said:
There is actually a way to do this avoiding the tangent and normal vectors.
Suppose we know the magnitude of velocity ##|\vec{v}|## and the magnitude of acceleration ##|\vec{a}|## at a specific time ##t_0##

if we can also calculate ##a_T=|\frac{d|\vec{v}|}{dt}|## at time ##t_0## ,which is the magnitude of the tangential acceleration, then the magnitude of the normal acceleration is ##|a_N|=\sqrt{|\vec{a}|^2-|\vec{a_T}|^2}##.

By knowing ##|\vec{v}|## and ##|a_N|## we can calculate the radius of curvature at time ##t_0##.
I considered showing the OP this method also, but, in the end, I though it would be easier to follow if I just dotted the acceleration vector with the unit normal (which is easy to derive from the unit tangent).
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #15
Ok, I think I've solved it... I'll tell you what I did:

First I found ##a_n## computing ##proyec_{\hat e_T} \vec a=(\frac{\vec a . \hat e_T}{||\hat e_T ||}). \hat e_T##. The result was ##(17,03;22,71)##, which was the acceleration in the tangential direction. Then I got ##a_n## from ##\vec a= \sqrt{||a_T||^2+||a_n||^2}## and finally I got ##\rho## from ##a_n=\frac{v^2}{\rho}##
 
Back
Top