Calculating the rotational component of a force on a Newtonian body?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simulating the rotational effects of a force on a square object in two dimensions. It explains how to break down the force vector into components affecting translation and rotation, emphasizing that the rotational motion is driven solely by the tangential component of the force. The relationship between torque and angular acceleration is highlighted, with the formula T = I*a, where I is the moment of inertia. Additionally, it notes that while the inertia tensor is constant in body-fixed coordinates, it may not be constant from an inertia frame perspective. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately simulating the object's motion.
bl184999
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to simulate a square object affected by a force in two dimensions. I can break up the force vector into a vector whose extension intersects the center of gravity for translation and a vector perpendicular to that for rotation. My question is: how does this rotational vector relate to the actual rotation of the object?

picture at:
http://www.crazylambs.com/images/square.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The relationship between tangential force F_t (which is perpendicular to the surface) and torque T is T = r*F_t, where 'r' is the distance from the center of rotation to the applied force. The torque and angular acceleration are related by T = I*a, where I is the moment of inertia. Note that as the square turnes, if the force remains constant, the tangential component changes as well, because the angle the force makes with the surface varies.
 
Thank you so much :)!
 
bl184999 said:
I can break up the force vector into a vector whose extension intersects the center of gravity for translation...
The translational acceleration is governed by the total force, not just the component that intersects the center of mass.
 
To elaborate on what Doc Al has said, the translational motion will be driven by both of your force components (the total force). The rotational motion will only be driven by the tangential component.
 
Andy Resnick said:
The torque and angular acceleration are related by T = I*a, where I is the moment of inertia.
Careful! While that is correct for this, and for other simple freshman-level problems, it is not true in general. The inertia tensor for a rigid body is always constant in body-fixed coordinates for a rigid body (it's a rigid body, after all). It is not in general constant from the perspective of an inertia frame. Freshman-level problems are always constructed to ensure that the inertial frame inertia tensor is constant, in which case T = I*a is valid.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top