Calculating the Spring Constant k of a Spring

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the spring constant k, the work-energy principle is applied, leading to the conclusion that k equals 1500 N/m when 30 J of work stretches the spring by 0.20 m. Initial attempts using the formulas F = -kx and PE = 1/2 kx^2 were incorrect, as they did not relate directly to work. The correct approach involved using the potential energy formula, resulting in k being derived as 1500. Additionally, a separate discussion on kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) for a roller coaster scenario highlighted the importance of accounting for energy lost to friction. The final calculations confirmed the KE at point B to be approximately 40 kJ, aligning with the expected outcome.
jimithing71
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
To stretch a spring a distance of 0.20m 30J of work is done. What is the value of the spring constant k of the spring?
a)6 b)30 c)150 d)1500 e)none of the above



I know that the answer is D 1500 but I can't quite arrive at that.



The two formulas I thought to try were F=-kx and PE=1/2kx^2 but those didn't work. Then, after a bit of perusing on here I found k=mg/x.
Thus, 30(9.8)/.20 = 1470 ...which is close to 1500 but is that correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimithing71 said:
The two formulas I thought to try were F=-kx and PE=1/2kx^2 but those didn't work.
Try again. Note that these formulas are for very different things. Only one of them relates to work/energy.
Then, after a bit of perusing on here I found k=mg/x.
Nah.
 
My head is starting to hurt! LOL!

Okay, so now I tried F=-kx, 30J=-k(.20m), 30J/.20m=-k, 150=k

That is one of the options (C), but our instructor told us the answer was (D) 1500. ?
 
jimithing71 said:
My head is starting to hurt! LOL!

Okay, so now I tried F=-kx, 30J=-k(.20m), 30J/.20m=-k, 150=k

That is one of the options (C), but our instructor told us the answer was (D) 1500. ?
You picked the wrong equation. F is force, not work. (PE is energy/work)

One more time.
 
Thank you! PE=1/2kx^6, 30=1/2k(.04), 30/.04=1/2k(.04)/.04, 750=1/2k, 1500=k Whew!

One more?

A roller coaster car with a mass of 900kg starts at rest from a point 20m above ground. At point B it is 12m above ground. If the initial KE was 0 and the work done against friction between the starting point and point B is 30,000J, what is the KE at point B?
a)10.8kJ b)20kJ c)30dj d)40kJ e) none of the above.

I know the answer is 40 kJ but I'm not sure which equation to use at all. The only one in my notes that seems close is KE=1/2mv^2 but that isn't working.
 
jimithing71 said:
The only one in my notes that seems close is KE=1/2mv^2 but that isn't working.
You need to worry about total mechanical energy: KE + PE. What's the formula for gravitational PE?
 
G=6.67X10^-11* N*m^2/kg^2 ??
 
Or wait! Is it PE=mgh??
 
yes it is
 
  • #10
cupid.callin said:
yes it is

Which one?
 
  • #11
jimithing71 said:
Or wait! Is it PE=mgh??
That's the one.
 
  • #12
Sorry but I don't get that at ALL! That would be PE=(900kg)(9.8g)(20m), PE= 176,400? What am I missing?
 
  • #13
jimithing71 said:
Sorry but I don't get that at ALL! That would be PE=(900kg)(9.8g)(20m), PE= 176,400? What am I missing?
You need to compare total mechanical energy at the starting point to that at point B. What happens to the total mechanical energy because of friction?
 
  • #14
It would be slowed due to friction? I am really lost on this one. I did the PE=mgh for point A and for point B and subtracted the two and got 70,560 so obviously that is wrong as well.
 
  • #15
jimithing71 said:
It would be slowed due to friction? I am really lost on this one. I did the PE=mgh for point A and for point B and subtracted the two and got 70,560 so obviously that is wrong as well.
Hint: If there were no friction, then:

KEA + PEA = KEB + PEB

How would you have to modify this to incorporate the energy lost to friction?
 
  • #16
I wish I knew!

Okay, last attempt:
KE(a) + PE(a) = KE(b) + PE(b)
0 + 176,400 = KE(b) + 105,840 + 30,000
176,400 - 105,840 - 30,000 = KE(b)
40,560 = KE(b)

?
 
  • #17
jimithing71 said:
I wish I knew!

Okay, last attempt:
KE(a) + PE(a) = KE(b) + PE(b)
0 + 176,400 = KE(b) + 105,840 + 30,000
176,400 - 105,840 - 30,000 = KE(b)
40,560 = KE(b)

?
Looks OK to me. One of the answer choices is pretty close.
 
  • #18
Is that it?
 
  • #19
jimithing71 said:
Is that it?
Yep. (Round off to one significant figure.)
 
  • #20
LOVE YOU Doc Al! Thanks for all your help! Time for a glass of vino! :0)
 
Back
Top