Calculating the Upward Force on Support B in a Bridge-Torque Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter mburt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the upward force at support B of a bridge with a truck on it. The problem involves determining the torque created by the truck and the bridge, leading to the equation Tclockwise = Tcounterclockwise. The calculated upward force at support B is found to be 4.5 × 10^4 N, while the book provides an incorrect answer of 4.6 × 10^3 N. Participants suggest that the discrepancy may arise from a difference in gravitational acceleration values used in the book. Overall, the method used for the calculation is confirmed to be correct, indicating a mistake in the book's answer.
mburt
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The diagram below shows a 2.0 × 103 kg truck on a 20.0 m long uniform bridge that has a mass of 8.0 × 103 kg. If the truck is 6.0 m from support A, what is the magnitude of the upward force at support B?

[PLAIN]http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/6554/torquev.png

Homework Equations



T = rFsin(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



[PLAIN]http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/5487/torqueattempt.png

Tclockwise = Tcounterclockwise
Ttruck + Tbridge = TB
(6.0m)(2000 kg)(9.80 m/s^2) + (10.0m)(8 000kg)(9.80m/s^2) = (20.0m)F
90160 Nm / 20.0m = F
F = 4.5x104 N

However the answer given is 4.6x103 N.

Any thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sum(torque) = 0

(6(mass-truck) + 10(mass-bridge))*g - 20FB = 0

FB = (9.8/20))*(6*2000+10*8000) which is about what you got so I don't know maybe they are using g = 9.81 and then are off by a factor of 10.
 
Maybe it's an incorrect answer... Hmm I'll wait for some other people's input too.

Thanks!
 
There is a mistake in the book answer. If you multiply the book answer by 9.8 you get your answer.
 
Your method is correct. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top