1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Calculating thermal resistance across a metal flange

  1. Mar 8, 2016 #1
    I've been using the following equation for thermal resistance to make basic calculations for a few different engineering designs: $$R_t = \frac{L}{kA} $$
    Where L is the resistance path length, A is the cross-sectional area perpendicular to this path and k is the thermal conductivity of the material (in my case, it is 21.4 W/m⋅K). I ran into an issue with calculating resistance for heat traveling from the inside diameter of a metal flange to the outside. This flange is essentially a large, thin washer, with ID 1.13", OD 1.90" and a thickness of .060". With everything else I was doing, my L was linear, and my A was constant, or at least made up of a finite number of constant areas that could be added in series. If I was calculating the thermal resistance through the axial direction of this flange, it would be a simple task, but as I was trying to calculate it radially, I figured I needed to integrate Rt from the inside radius surface to the outside radius surface, but I think my difficulty has been in setting up the correct integral.

    I know that the cross sectional area at a given radius is essentially that of a cylinder: circumference x height, and I assumed that since I was trying to integrate from the inner radius (.565") to the outer (.950") that the integral would be in polar coordinates, giving me:
    $$R_t = \int_{r_0}^{r_1}\frac{L (rdr)}{k (2\pi rh)} $$
    where h is the thickness (.060") and L is the difference between my inner and outer radius (.385"). Everything moves to the outside of the integral except rdr/r, which leaves me simply with a factor of r after integration, which is evaluated between the inside and outside radius. This is the same thing as my L, so my resistance would seem to be ##R_t = L^2/2\pi kh ##, and this evaluates to 0.724 K/W (once I converted my k value to 0.543 W/in⋅K). The problem with this answer is twofold: for one, I was unsure how to analyze the dimensionality of my final R expression, since I had done integration, but on the surface, it doesn't lead to units of K/W. Secondly, while the final number seems more or less appropriate, a calculation of R assuming a constant cross sectional area of .358in2 (the area at the outermost radius) gave me a minimum possible R value of 1.98 K/W, even higher than what I got.

    I then considered that since my L was simply r1-r0, I may need to turn it into an additional r term in the integrand numerator, giving me $$R_t = \frac{1}{2\pi kh}\int_{r_0}^{r_1}\frac{r^2 dr}{r} $$
    Which evaluates to ##R_t = ({r_1}^2 -{r_0}^2)/4\pi kh ##, leaving me with 1.42 K/W--closer, but still below the minimum value.

    At this point, I am wondering if I am way off on my attempts to set up an integral, since my dimensions don't appear to match up. Additionally, I'm not sure I should be using polar coordinates in this case, or if my underlying R = L/kA formula is even applicable in this scenario. Would appreciate it if someone could point me in the right direction with this!

    [Update]: Interestingly, an R expression of ##[ln(r_1) -ln(r_0)]/2 \pi kh ## gives me the correct units and a realistic answer of 2.54 K/W, but that would require a 1/r term in my integrand, and I don't see why that would be appropriate.
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2016
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 8, 2016 #2
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted