Calculating Thickness of Lenses for Max. Reflection: n1, n2, λ

  • Thread starter Thread starter toothpaste666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses Thickness
AI Thread Summary
To maximize reflection using two thin layers of materials with refractive indices n1 and n2, the minimum thickness d1 should be calculated as d1 = λ/(4n1) to ensure constructive interference. For the second layer, d2 is determined by the relationship d2 = λ/(4n1n2), accounting for the phase shift that occurs at the boundary. The confusion arises from the need to consider both indices of refraction when calculating d2, particularly regarding potential phase shifts. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the formulas for thickness in relation to the wavelengths and refractive indices involved. Understanding these relationships is crucial for achieving optimal reflection in the design of the mirror.
toothpaste666
Messages
516
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


A highly reflective mirror can be made for a particular wavelength at normal incidence by using two thin layers of transparent materials of indices of refraction n1 and n2 (1 < n1<n2 ) on the surface of the glass ( n>n2 ).(Figure 1)

giancoli-ch34-p52-jpg.75225.jpg


A)What should be the minimum thicknesses d1 in the figure in terms of the incident wavelength λ, to maximize reflection?Express your answer in terms of the variables n1, n2, and λ.

B)
What should be the minimum thickness d2 in the figure in terms of the incident wavelength λ, to maximize reflection?
Express your answer in terms of the variables n1, n2, and λ.

Homework Equations


2t = (lamda n)
(lamda n) = lamda/n

The Attempt at a Solution


they want us to maximize reflection so that means they want constructive interference so we use

2d_1 = (lambda_n) = lamda/n_1

d_1= lambda / 2n_1

i put this as my answer for part a but it was wrong. I am guessing I need to include n_2
in my equation but i am not quite sure how to relate them. can someone point me in the right direction?
 

Attachments

  • GIANCOLI.ch34.p52.jpg
    GIANCOLI.ch34.p52.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 913
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the main reason i am confused is that i don't see how the index of refraction n2 would affect the thickness d1. it seems that n1 and n2 would affect d2 but only n1 would affect d1
 
oh wait i accidently entered it into mastering physics as n1(lambda/2) -__- i turned out to be right about that one
 
so for the part B)
the wavelength of the light entering d2 is lambda/n1
2d_2 = \frac{\frac{lambda}{n_1}}{n_2}

d_2 = \frac{lambda}{2n_1n_2}

is this correct?
 
or would it undergo a 180 degree phase shift and be
d2 = lambda/4n1n2
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top