Calculating Thrill Ride Velocity Using Potential and Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the velocity of a thrill ride can be achieved by using the principles of potential and kinetic energy, particularly when starting from a known height. The initial velocity at the top of a hill allows for the calculation of velocity at various heights by converting potential energy into kinetic energy. G-forces alone are not useful for this calculation unless the radius of turns is known, as they act perpendicular to the direction of motion. Understanding these energy transformations is crucial for accurate velocity predictions throughout the ride. This approach provides a solid foundation for analyzing thrill ride dynamics.
moonman239
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
I have a question. Would it be possible to calculate the velocity of a thrill ride at any given time, given the rate of change in g-forces and the velocity of the ride at the start (or if there's a hill at the start, the velocity of the car going uphill)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the height of the hill, you can calcuate the velocity at any other known height by converting potential energy to kinetic.

G-forces won't help you with anything because they are perpendicular to the direction of motion...unless you have the radius of the turns.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Can energy be decomposed?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Regarding the radius in the orbital velocity
Replies
11
Views
2K
B The physics of flywheel launchers (like tennis ball shooters)
2
Replies
60
Views
4K
Power required to reach X velocity in X time with drag
Replies
10
Views
2K
Escape Velocity Question: Why is the final kinetic energy = 0?
Replies
21
Views
5K
I Work-Energy Theorem for Moving Block and Spring System?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Angular velocity of a rod and what formula to use while solving.
Replies
15
Views
2K
B Questions about momentum and force as well as normal force/friction
Replies
35
Views
3K
Internal forces converting kinetic into potential energy (vice versa)
Replies
10
Views
2K
A question about potential energy and work
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top