Calculating Time Dilation: Apollo's Record-Breaking Speed and Earth's Clocks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time dilation experienced by the Apollo X module during its record speed return from the moon. The user attempts to determine the percent difference between the Apollo clocks and Earth's clocks using the Lorentz transformation but arrives at an incorrect answer. They correctly calculate the speed of Apollo in meters per second and the time elapsed in the spaceship frame but struggle with the time dilation calculation. A key point raised is the importance of correctly converting the spacecraft's speed from miles per hour to meters per second, as well as ensuring accurate calculations within the Lorentz transformation. The user seeks assistance in identifying the error in their logic or calculations.
Quelsita
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Question:

The record for the fastest speed at which anyone has ever traveled, relative to the Earth, is held by the Apollo X modue at 24,791 mi/h on their return trip from the moon.
At this speed, what is the percent difference between the clocks on the Apollo and the clocks on Earth?

OK, I think I understand how to do the problem, but I'm not getting the answer that our text gives.

I set the moving IRF as the Apollo and the stationary frame as the Earth.
I then found the time elapsed in the frame of the spaceship by using d=vt and the given velocity and the distance from the Earth to the moon.
So:

VApollo=V=24,791mi/h=11082.3m/s
d(Earth to Moon)=3.84x10^8 m

With no time dilation for the ship, the time elapsed then is:
from d=vt: tApollo=t'=3.84x10^8 m/11082.3m/s = 34649.85 s

I then found the time dilation for the time elapsed in Earth's reference frame using Lorentz tranformation:
t=t'/\sqrt{1-(V/c)^2}

gives an elapsed time in Earth' IRF of 346449.85s

and 346449.85s/34649.85s = 9.985%

The correct answer is 6.82x10^-8 s

Could someone help me figure out where I went wrong? I went over the math a few times, so it must be my logic...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have a calculator handy, but something went wrong in that square root calc. Did you note that the spacecraft speed is in mph, so in the same units c = 186000*3600 ?

Doubtless that square root is well within 1% of 1.
 
Yeah, I actually converted the velocity to m/s I just skipped the conversion work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top