Calculating Time for Two Cars to Meet in Alaska

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikefitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Cars
AI Thread Summary
Two cars, a BMW traveling at 105 km/h and a VW at 43 km/h, are approaching each other on a straight road in Alaska, with an initial distance of 11 km between them. To determine the time until they meet, the combined speed of both vehicles, 148 km/h, is calculated by adding their velocities. Dividing the distance of 11 km by their combined speed yields a time of approximately 268.29 seconds for the cars to meet. The discussion emphasizes visualizing one car as stationary to simplify the problem. The calculation confirms that the approach is correct and leads to the desired result.
mikefitz
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Two cars are driving toward each other on a straight and level road in Alaska. The BMW is traveling at 105 km/h north and the VW is traveling at 43 km/h south, both velocities measured relative to the road. At a certain instant, the distance between the cars is 11 km. Approximately how long will it take from that instant for the two cars to meet? [Hint: Consider a reference frame in which one of the cars is at rest.]

I'm trying to think of the best way to attack this problem. Wouldn't it make sense to add both vehicles velocities and then figure out how fast they could travel 11km? would that yield the correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup, that's right :)
 
268.29 seconds is correct, yay!
 
I think what they want you to do is think that the one car is stopped, remove the road and even the Earth from the mental picture. Picture yourself in the car going 43km/h south. If there is nothing around you at all, it could appear that you are stopped, and he is coming at you at 148km/h, right?
 
edit: nevermind. lol, mispost.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top