MHB Calculating Uncertainties of Measured quantities (Physics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating uncertainties for measured quantities in a physics problem involving acceleration and distance. The initial values provided include measurements for distance and velocity, each with associated uncertainties. A calculation for acceleration using these values yields a result of approximately 7.75 m/s², but there is confusion regarding the calculation of another distance, d3. Participants emphasize that there is no universal formula for error propagation; the method depends on the specific experimental context and the types of operations performed on the measured quantities. The thread highlights the importance of using appropriate formulas for combining uncertainties in different mathematical operations.
Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
d1 = 2.53 cm +/- .05 cm

d2 = 1.753 m +/- .001 m

0 = 23.5 degrees +/- .5 degrees

v1 = 1.55 m/s +/- .15 m/s

Using the measured quantities above, calculate the following. Express the uncertainty calculated value.

a = 4 v1^2 / d2

a = 4 (1.55 m/s +/-.15 m/s)^2 / 1.753 m +/- .001 m

a = 6.8 m/s ^2 / 1.754 m

a = 13.6 m/s / 1.754 m

a = 7.753705815

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

d3 = 4 (d1 + d2)d3 = 4 (2.53 cm +/- .05 cm) + (1.753 m +/- .001 m)d3 = 10.12 cm +/- .2 cm + 7.012 m +/- .004 md3 = 10.32 cm + 7.016 m

I tried to work this problem out, but I don't understand it and think it's not right. Someone please help me with this problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Joystar1977 said:
d1 = 2.53 cm +/- .05 cm

d2 = 1.753 m +/- .001 m

0 = 23.5 degrees +/- .5 degrees

v1 = 1.55 m/s +/- .15 m/s

Using the measured quantities above, calculate the following. Express the uncertainty calculated value.

d3 = 4 (d1 + d2)

d3 = 4 (2.53 cm +/- .05 cm) + (1.753 m +/- .001 m)

d3 = 10.12 cm +/- .2 cm + 7.012 m +/- .004 m

d3 = 10.32 cm + 7.016 m

I tried to work this out, but I don't think it's right so someone please help me.
There is no single formula that you can use to get errors. Which you use depends on what kind of experiment you are doing and what data you have. One of the typical ones in use is this:

Given x, y and their respective errors [math]\Delta x,~\Delta y[/math] and the equation z = x + y you can calculate
[math]\frac{\Delta z}{z} = \sqrt{ \left ( \frac{\Delta x}{x} \right ) ^2 + \left ( \frac{\Delta y}{y} \right ) ^2}[/math]

You can use the same formula for z = xy or z = x/y as well. If you have more variables, such as z = x + y + w just add a term for w under the square root.

-Dan
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top