MHB Calculating Uncertainties of Measured quantities (Physics)

Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
d1 = 2.53 cm +/- .05 cm

d2 = 1.753 m +/- .001 m

0 = 23.5 degrees +/- .5 degrees

v1 = 1.55 m/s +/- .15 m/s

Using the measured quantities above, calculate the following. Express the uncertainty calculated value.

a = 4 v1^2 / d2

a = 4 (1.55 m/s +/-.15 m/s)^2 / 1.753 m +/- .001 m

a = 6.8 m/s ^2 / 1.754 m

a = 13.6 m/s / 1.754 m

a = 7.753705815

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

d3 = 4 (d1 + d2)d3 = 4 (2.53 cm +/- .05 cm) + (1.753 m +/- .001 m)d3 = 10.12 cm +/- .2 cm + 7.012 m +/- .004 md3 = 10.32 cm + 7.016 m

I tried to work this problem out, but I don't understand it and think it's not right. Someone please help me with this problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Joystar1977 said:
d1 = 2.53 cm +/- .05 cm

d2 = 1.753 m +/- .001 m

0 = 23.5 degrees +/- .5 degrees

v1 = 1.55 m/s +/- .15 m/s

Using the measured quantities above, calculate the following. Express the uncertainty calculated value.

d3 = 4 (d1 + d2)

d3 = 4 (2.53 cm +/- .05 cm) + (1.753 m +/- .001 m)

d3 = 10.12 cm +/- .2 cm + 7.012 m +/- .004 m

d3 = 10.32 cm + 7.016 m

I tried to work this out, but I don't think it's right so someone please help me.
There is no single formula that you can use to get errors. Which you use depends on what kind of experiment you are doing and what data you have. One of the typical ones in use is this:

Given x, y and their respective errors [math]\Delta x,~\Delta y[/math] and the equation z = x + y you can calculate
[math]\frac{\Delta z}{z} = \sqrt{ \left ( \frac{\Delta x}{x} \right ) ^2 + \left ( \frac{\Delta y}{y} \right ) ^2}[/math]

You can use the same formula for z = xy or z = x/y as well. If you have more variables, such as z = x + y + w just add a term for w under the square root.

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top