Calculating Volume of Air for Nitrogen Dioxide Dillution

  • Thread starter Thread starter synergix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the volume of air needed to dilute HNO3 to 0.050 ppm from 560 g of NO2, the reaction equation indicates that 4 moles of NO2 produce 4 moles of HNO3. Using the ideal gas law (V=nRT/P), the volume of HNO3 gas produced is first determined. A dilution ratio is then applied, leading to a calculated air volume of approximately 5.9 x 10^9 liters. This calculation assumes constant temperature and pressure conditions. The solution appears to be correct based on the calculations provided.
synergix
Messages
177
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Nitrogen dioxide reacts with water in the atmosphere to produce acid rain.
4N02(g)+2H20(g)+O2(g)------> 4HNO3(g)
assuming that the temperature and the pressure remain constant, calculate the volume of air at 1 atm, 20oC, necessary to dilute the HNO3(g) to 0.050 ppm(by volume) when 560.g of NO2(g) is allowed to react.

Homework Equations



V=nRT/P where n=number of moles, R=ideal gas constant, T=temperature, P= pressure

The Attempt at a Solution



First calculate the volume of HNO3 gas that will be produced. then using the equation a/b=c/d
I calculated the volume required to dilute

.050L/1,000,000L = 292.808L / V

solve for V and I got 5.9 x 10^9 L
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top