Calculating Water Volume in a Cumulus Cloud

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the water volume in a cylindrical cumulus cloud with a height of 3.2 km and a radius of 1.2 km, the volume formula for a cylinder (V = π * h * r²) is applied. A cubic centimeter of cloud contains between 50 to 500 water drops, each with a radius of 10 µm, which needs conversion to cubic centimeters and then to cubic meters. The user attempted to multiply the cloud's volume by the water volume per cubic centimeter but encountered errors, likely related to unit conversions. The discussion highlights the importance of careful conversion between micrometers and meters to ensure accurate calculations. Properly addressing these conversions is crucial for obtaining the correct water volume in the cloud.
jav6454
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cubic centimeter in a typical cumulus cloud contains 50 to 500 water drops, which have a typical radius of 10 µm. For that range, give the lower value and the higher value, respectively, for the following.

How many cubic meters of water are in a cylindrical cumulus cloud of height 3.2 km and radius 1.2 km?

Homework Equations


Volume Formula of a Cylinder ==>
V = 3.14 * h * r2 (squared)
Volume Formula of a Sphere ==>
V = 4/3 * 3.14 * r3 (cubic)

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to find the volume of the Cubic Centimeter using the 10µm of a drop and multiplying respectively (50 or 500). However I converted the µm to cm to get the Volume in cm3. Then I convert that to cubic meter.

Later I find the volume for the cloud (I find this in cubic meter). Multiply that times the volume of the respective min and max values for the volume of cubic centimeter in the cloud, but in come sout wrong...what am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without actually seeing each step, I'm guessing that you may be having a conversion probelm from um to m, etc. Other than that, it looks like the logic is Okay.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top