Calculating Wave Length in Monochromatic Light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the wavelength of monochromatic light based on given parameters, including the distance to the screen and the position of the dark fringe. The initial calculation yielded a wavelength of approximately 429.427 nm, but it was noted that the answer should be rounded to 430 nm for consistency with the significant figures of the measurements. A critical correction was made regarding the identification of the dark fringe; the fourth dark fringe corresponds to m=3.5, not m=4, which affects the wavelength calculation. The use of the small angle approximation was also highlighted, where sin(theta) can be approximated as tan(theta) when the angle is small. This discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying fringe positions in wave interference problems.
Kris1120
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A screen is illuminated by monochromatic
light.
The distance from the slits to the screen is
7.4 m.
What is the wave length if the distance from the central bright region to the fourth
dark fringe is 2.6 cm.
Answer in units of nm.


Homework Equations


x=L*tan(theta)

sin(theta)=(m+.5) lambda/d


The Attempt at a Solution



theta= inverse tan( 2.6e-2 / 7.4) = .201309

lambda = (.55e-3) sin(.201309) / 4.5 = 429.427 nm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
correct, but way too many digits. 430 nm is the proper way to give the answer, since only two digits are given for L and x.

By the way, when the angle is very small (such as is the case here) sin theta = tan theta.

That way, you can save some time and see that x/L=(m lambda)/d

It'll be like that whenever L is much greater than x
 
Kris1120 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



theta= inverse tan( 2.6e-2 / 7.4) = .201309

lambda = (.55e-3) sin(.201309) / 4.5 = 429.427 nm


I don't believe this is correct. The fourth dark fringe does not correspond to m=4 in that equation.
 
Alphysicist is right. Fourth dark fringe is halfway between the 3rd & 4th bright fringe, so the "m-factor" should be 3.5.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top