Calculating Wavelength of H_α for a Receding Star

  • Thread starter Thread starter azatkgz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star Wavelength
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of the H_alpha line from a receding star moving at 3000 km/s. The original formula suggested for the wavelength adjustment was incorrect; the correct formula accounts for redshift due to the Doppler effect. The proper equation is λ = λ_o + (λ_o * v/c), indicating that the wavelength increases as the star recedes. This reflects the phenomenon where objects moving away from an observer experience a redshift. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing spectral lines in astrophysics.
azatkgz
Messages
182
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One of the most prominent spectral lines of hydrogen is H_\alpha line.A bright red light with wavelength of 656.1\times 10^{-9}m.What's the expected wavelength of the H_\alpha line from a star receding with a speed of 3000 km/s?






The Attempt at a Solution



Is it just \lambda=\lambda_o-\frac{\lambda_ov}{c}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
azatkgz said:

Homework Statement


One of the most prominent spectral lines of hydrogen is H_\alpha line.A bright red light with wavelength of 656.1\times 10^{-9}m.What's the expected wavelength of the H_\alpha line from a star receding with a speed of 3000 km/s?






The Attempt at a Solution



Is it just \lambda=\lambda_o-\frac{\lambda_ov}{c}

I believe that should be: \lambda=\lambda_o+\frac{\lambda_ov}{c}

When objects move away from the observer, the doppler shift, increases the wavelength (red-shifts it).

Sam
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top