Calculating wavelengths of photons / photospheric temperatures

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelengths of photons that can ionize hydrogen (HI) and potassium (KI) based on their ionization potentials of 13.6 eV and 4.3 eV, respectively. The user initially applies the formula e = (hc)/λ to find the wavelengths, seeking further guidance on the next steps. There is a mention of stars having a black body spectrum, which relates to their temperature and is connected to Planck's law of black body radiation. The conversation emphasizes the need to understand how these calculations tie into the photospheric temperatures of stars that emit photons capable of ionizing these atoms. Overall, the thread highlights the relationship between photon wavelengths, ionization, and stellar temperatures.
Toad
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The ionization potentials of HI and KI are 13.6 and 4.3 ev. Calculate the wavelengths of photons that can ionize HI and KI. Calculate the photospheric temperatures of stars that peak at these wavelengths, and hence radiate plenty of photons at shorter wavelengths capable of ionizing these atoms.

First, I calculated the wavelengths using e=(hc)/lambda . I have lambda=(hc)/13.6 and lambda=(hc)/lambda . Now what do I do next? Any suggestions are welcome! Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toad said:
Now what do I do next?

What kind of spectrum does a star have? How does it relate to the star's temperature?
 
SpaceTiger said:
What kind of spectrum does a star have? How does it relate to the star's temperature?
Well... it has a black body spectrum. I supposed it relates with Planck's law of black body radiation? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_function I'm still not exactly sure what to do.

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top