Calculating Wavelengths of Soundwaves: v = λ*f

  • Thread starter Thread starter Denver Dang
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating soundwave wavelengths using the formula v = λ*f, with specific examples of 10 Hz and 20,000 Hz soundwaves yielding wavelengths of 34.3 m and 1.715 cm, respectively. The question arises whether a wall must match these wavelengths to effectively block the sound, assuming the wall is infinitely tall and wide. Participants note that the speed of sound varies in different materials, which affects the wavelength and necessary wall thickness for soundproofing. It is suggested that a wall's effectiveness depends on both its thickness and the material's sound speed properties. Understanding these factors is crucial for effective sound insulation.
Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1
A little question I hope you can help me with.
If you got the low frequency bass notes and some high notes as well.
Then you have the formula:
v = \lambda*f

A quick calculation gives you a wavelength of 34,3 m for af 10 Hz soundwave and 1.715 cm for a 20.000 Hz soundwave.

Does that mean that I would need a 34,4 m wall to stop the waves of a 10 Hz soundwave, if we imagine that wall being infinitetly tall and wide, and then only 1.716 cm wall to stop the waves from a 20.000 Hz soundwave ?

Or is there some other factors that play along ?


Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably you worked out the wavelength in air.

Have you thought that the speed of sound might change in the wall?
 
I've thought of that yes. But do you have to calculate the wall-thickness depending on the material that the wall is made of ?
So if the wall is made of material that doubles the speed of sound, compared to air, the wavelength doubles and you need a thicker wall ?
Or is it a mixture of both ? :S
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top