Calculating Wind Velocity Given Force, Air Density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating wind velocity using the aerodynamic force exerted on an object, given the air density. The formula used is F = 1/2 ρ V² S C, where C represents the aerodynamic coefficient, S is the reference area, and ρ is the air density. The coefficient C varies based on factors like the Mach number and Reynolds number, and it is typically determined through wind tunnel testing. For practical applications, using a pitot-static tube can directly measure wind velocity by comparing pressure differences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aerodynamic forces and coefficients
  • Familiarity with the concepts of Mach number and Reynolds number
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics principles
  • Experience with using pitot-static tubes for measuring pressure
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between aerodynamic coefficients and flow conditions
  • Learn about wind tunnel testing methods for measuring C
  • Research the application of pitot-static tubes in various environments
  • Explore computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for wind velocity calculations
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, fluid dynamics researchers, and professionals involved in wind measurement and aerodynamic analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
If I know the force that a wind is exerting on an object, is it be possible to determine what velocity the wind is moving at? I also know the air density.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's pretty much how anemometers work, so it's definitely possible.
I'm afraid that I can't supply any formulae, though.
 
The aerodynamic force acting on a solid body can be expressed by a general equation:

F = 1/2 \rho V^2 S C

Where:
C is a force coefficient (either lift Cl, drag Cd or Cx, or whatever you're looking for)
S is a reference area (either frontal area, wing area for airplanes etc.)

The problem lies in the coefficient C. It depends on some adimensional numbers (Mach number and Reynolds number in most cases) and is usualy measured in a wind tunnel on a scaled model of the object.

If you were able to measure the force acting on the solid body, and if you knew the value of the aerodynamic coefficient C, then you wuld be also able to calculate the velocity from the formula above.

If you only knew the values of C vs. V (through Reynolds number) then it would necessarily be an iterative process, since you would have to estimate an initial V, then you would calculate C for that V, then you would recalculate V with that value of C, and then recalculate C with the new value of V, and so on and so on and so on... till the convergence of the result. :zzz:

On the other hand, if you had data (from real-scale or wind-tunnel measurements) which relate directly F to V (usually for incompressible flows and near-standard temperatures) then the process is straightforward: measure F --> read V from the F-V curve.
 
Last edited:
In practice, that method is difficult, but what you could do is use a pito-static tube.
 
Daiquiri said:
The aerodynamic force acting on a solid body can be expressed by a general equation:

F = 1/2 \rho V^2 S C
...
Can you add units I shall use to calculate force?

I found that Cx for flat wall is 1.5

R
 
C has no units. The other quantities on the right-hand-side of the equation combine to give force units.

As long as you use a consistent set of units for the different quantities, the result will be a force. For example:

\rho in kg/m^3
V in m/s
S in m^2

Resulting units are
(kg / m^3) * (m/s)^2 * m^2
= (kg / m^3) * (m^2 / s^2) * m^2
= (kg / m^3) * m^4 / s^2
= kg * m / s^2
= Newtons
 
Thank you
 
As mentiond the pitot-static tube measures wind velocity, and does so via comparason of the pressure (force per unit area) in 2chambers connected to tubes, one that face into the wind and and one perpendicular to the wind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K