Calculating Work and Force of Air Resistance on a Falling Pinecone

  • Thread starter Thread starter shaggyace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by air resistance on a falling pinecone, the problem involves determining the initial velocity without air resistance, which was incorrectly calculated as 18.78 m/s. The correct approach utilizes the work-kinetic energy theorem, where the net work is the difference between gravitational work and work done by air resistance. The energy balance equation PE(1) + KE(1) = PE(2) + KE(2) + Work can help clarify the relationships between potential energy, kinetic energy, and work. Understanding the role of air resistance is crucial, as it affects the final speed of the pinecone, which is given as 11 m/s. Accurate calculations are essential to solve both parts of the problem effectively.
shaggyace
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 0.16 kg pinecone falls 18 m to the ground where it lands with a speed of 11 m/s.

a)How much work was done on the pinecone by air resistance?

b)What was the average for of air resistance exerted on the pine cone?

Homework Equations



ƩF=ma

Vf^2=Vi^2 + 2aΔx

W=FΔx=maΔx=1/2(mVf^2)-1/2(mVi^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the kinematic equation to find initial velocity while setting the acceleration as gravity. I got 18.78 m/s but that doesn't seem right. I tried using that initial velocity in the work-kinetic energy theorem and it came out to -28.275. However that was the wrong answer. I don't understand where to start with this problem let alone part B. Someone help me please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 18.78 m/sec represents the speed if there were no wind resistance. Note that it is larger than what was presented in the problem statement.

Write an energy balance such as:

PE(1) + KE(1) = PE(2) + KE(2) + Work
 
The net work done is equivalent to the work by gravity minus the work by friction.

EDIT: My way is essentially a rearrangement of LawrenceC's formula above.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top