Calculating work done by gravity

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a user calculates the work done by gravity on a 10kg bucket lifted 3.0m, initially using the formula Work = Force * Distance, resulting in 294J. However, the answer key indicates that the work done by gravity is -300J, emphasizing the negative sign due to the force of gravity acting in the opposite direction of the lift. The conversation clarifies that while the simpler method is valid for one-dimensional problems, the more complex equation Wext = Fextdcosθ is more general and applicable in various scenarios. Ultimately, both methods yield the same result in this specific case since the angle is zero. The user decides to stick with the simpler approach for this problem.
JustynSC
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 10kg bucket of water is lifted vertically 3.0m at a constant speed. How much work did gravity do on the bucket during this process?

Homework Equations


Work=Force*Distance (what thought to use)
Wext=Fextdcosθ (what the answer key says to use.

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt got me as far as plugging in: Work=(9.8m/s2*10kg)*3.0m=(98N)*3.0kg=294J
***In the answer key they used 10m/s2 for gravity, but also had a negative answer of -300J. I assume that they used the negative as a direction, but is work a vector or scalar? Looking to understand why the way I did this does not yeild the same answer, and how the formula the keys says to use works?***
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force is in the opposite direction of motion, therefore work done by gravity is negative. You should change the sign of either the acceleration or the 3 meter distance, because they point in opposite directions.
 
Okay thanks I was thinking something along those lines, but why would the key ask to solve using that other equation? It seems more complicated than the way I did it. does my method only work in limited scenarios and the other has a broader range of uses?
 
Well, the equation with the angle is more general, but as your problem is one-dimensional you don't need that.
 
I see. In that case I will stick to my simple method :) Thanks!
 
In this case the angle is zero and Cos(0)=1 so both equations are the same.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top