Calculating Work Done by Horse in 9.9 minutes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zhalfirin88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
AI Thread Summary
A horse pulls a cart with a force of 175.0 N at an angle of 31.0 degrees, moving at a speed of 10.4 km/hr for 9.9 minutes. The calculated distance is approximately 1716.066 m, leading to an initial work calculation of around 274707.695 J. However, confusion arises regarding the need to break down the force into components and the correct application of the cosine function. Ultimately, the key issue identified is the use of radians instead of degrees in the cosine calculation, which affects the final answer. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying trigonometric functions in work calculations.
Zhalfirin88
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horse pulls a cart with a force of 175.0 N at and angle of 31.0o with respect to the horizontal and moves along at a speed of 10.4 km/hr. How much work does the horse do in 9.9 min?

The Attempt at a Solution



Distance = {2.889 \frac{m}{s}} * 594s = 1716.066 m

175 * 1 716.066 * cos 31^o = 274707.695 J

But that doesn't even look right either...I can think of 2 ways why this is wrong.
1) I didn't use the right formula for distance. Would I have to solve for ax then use x = vt + .5at^2?
2) Break up the force into components, but I didn't think you had to with the dot product?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It isn't - which side of the triangle are you looking for?

Hint - what happens to the power as the 31deg -> zero?
 
mgb_phys said:
It isn't - which side of the triangle are you looking for?

Hint - what happens to the power as the 31deg -> zero?

No idea.
 
If the slope gets flatter is that more or less work?
Does cos(angle) get larger or smaller as 'angle' gets less?
 
Why would it matter what the components of force are? Isn't it just asking how much work the horse is doing? Wouldn't that just be force*distance? Granted, gravity is doing negative work, but are you sure you have to take that into consideration?
 
Exactly - without friction you only do work in the distance the force moves against gravity
 
If the slope gets flatter is that more or less work?
Does cos(angle) get larger or smaller as 'angle' gets less?

I don't really get how helps, the lesser the slope the lesser the work.

Why would it matter what the components of force are? Isn't it just asking how much work the horse is doing? Wouldn't that just be force*distance? Granted, gravity is doing negative work, but are you sure you have to take that into consideration?

Then why is my answer wrong?
 
Last edited:
Zhalfirin88 said:
I don't really get how helps, the lesser the slope the lesser the work.
Correct,
now how does Cosine() change as the angle gets smaller ?
 
mgb_phys said:
Correct,
now how does Cosine() change as the angle gets smaller ?

It becomes closer to 1.
 
  • #10
But as the slope gets smaller you want the amount of work to get closer to zero !
 
  • #11
I don't get what you're trying to tell me!
 
  • #12
Hi Zhalfirin88! :smile:
Zhalfirin88 said:
A horse pulls a cart with a force of 175.0 N at and angle of 31.0o with respect to the horizontal and moves along at a speed of 10.4 km/hr. How much work does the horse do in 9.9 min?

Distance = {2.889 \frac{m}{s}} * 594s = 1716.066 m

175 * 1 716.066 * cos 31^o = 274707.695 J

But that doesn't even look right either...

Looks ok to me. :confused:

(except you have ridiculously many sig figs! :rolleyes:)​
I can think of 2 ways why this is wrong.
1) I didn't use the right formula for distance. Would I have to solve for ax then use x = vt + .5at^2?

No, this sort of question is telling you that the speed is a constant 10.4 …

it doesn't bother to tell you why, but obviously there must be some other forces, such as friction, which are reducing the net force to zero, so the acceleration is zero.

Your x = vt formula is correct. :smile:
2) Break up the force into components, but I didn't think you had to with the dot product?

That's right, you don't.

Work done is just force "dot" distance moved …

the force is at 31º to the (horizontal) distance moved, so cos31º should be correct.
 
  • #13
When I typed it online for an answer I put 2.75 x 10^5 J. I don't know why it's wrong, I've given everything the problem says, there wasn't a picture or anything.
 
  • #14
Got it!

You used cos 31 radians instead of cos 31º :rolleyes:

Everything perfect apart from that! :biggrin:
 
  • #15
I'm never using google calculator instead of my own again... :P Good catch, never would've though of that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top