Calculating Work Done on 7.1 kg Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crush1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
AI Thread Summary
A force of 3.5 î + 2.7 ĵ N acts on a 7.1 kg object over a displacement of -2.2 î + 3.9 j m. The initial attempts to calculate work done using the force and displacement magnitudes led to incorrect results, indicating a misunderstanding of vector components. The correct approach involves using the dot product of the force and displacement vectors, followed by dividing by the time to find the average power. The final calculation suggests that the average rate of work done is 10 W. This highlights the importance of considering vector directions when calculating work.
Crush1986
Messages
205
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement




A force of ⃑ = 3.5 î+2.7 ĵ N acts on a 7.1 kg object over a displacement of = −2.2 î+3.9 j
m in a time period of ∆t = 0.28 s. At what average rate is work being
done?

Homework Equations


W= ΔKE
Kinematic equations
F=Ma
W= Fd



The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried a few ways, I know I'm wrong on the first and not sure of the second
The first way I tried to find the magnitude of force and displacement. I got that the Force's magnitude was 4.42N and the displacement was 4.478m. I then used W= Fd to find the work (4.42N)(4.478m)= 19.793J to find the rate of work I divided by the time (.28s) giving me 70.7 W. This is WAY off from the multiple choice answers which are .4W, .76W, 1.5W, 2.8W, and 10W. I'm not sure what my failure in logic is here. Maybe the force isn't directly pointed the same way as the displacement as I'm assuming? Or maybe something to do with resulting the displacement and force first... I'd love to know.

Attempt two: This time I focused more on the change in kinetic energy equaling the Work approach. Now for this I assumed the car was at rest to begin with... Not sure if that is ok. So I used the magnitude of the force (4.42N) and the weight of the car (7.1kg) to find the acceleration by a= F/m, (.6225 m/s^2) I used the given time to calculate the final velocity by doing a*t and that gave me a final velocity of .1743 m/s. I then calculated KE by 1/2mv^2 and divided it by time to find the rate of work. This gave me .39W, which is close to answer A.

Is attempt two correct? Or am I off...

I thank anyone for their time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, upon some further thinking, I think I dot product the two vectors and divide by time? Fd/t. So it ends up being 10w.
 
Crush1986 said:
Ok, upon some further thinking, I think I dot product the two vectors and divide by time? Fd/t. So it ends up being 10w.
yes. The x comp of the force can only do work in the x direction and the y comp of the force can only do work in the y direction. You can add those work values up and divide by the time to get the same result.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top