Calculating Work Done on Moving Object: Initial vs Final Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of work done on a moving object, particularly in scenarios involving initial and final velocities. It clarifies that work is calculated based on the change in kinetic energy, represented as 0.5m(v_final^2 - v_initial^2). When an object is stationary and a force is applied, the work done is not zero if the object later moves, as the work done by the applied force is significant. However, once the force is removed and the object stops, the net work done is zero, as resistive forces like friction do negative work. The key takeaway is that while net work can be zero, the work done by individual forces must be considered for a complete understanding.
MechaMZ
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
An object is moving with an initial velocity 5m/s, if I'm applying a force against it and it stops after a displacement.

So the work done is equal to 0.5m(0)2-0.5m(5)2

A stationary object, 0m/s, if I'm applying a force to it and it moves with a velocity of 5m/s, and stop after the force removed.

So the work done is equal to zero? 0.5m(0)2-0.5m(0)2=0
Should it be zero? and why it is zero? the object did travel a distance isn't?

definition: Work is a measure of change of energy.
So does it mean no matter how far an object moved, or how fast it has moved, we only consider the initial velocity and final velocity?

for eg, an object moved from stationary, speed up to 2m/s for 30min, then slower down to 1m/s and speed up to 5m/s for 1 hour, then finally it stop and remain stationary again. the work done in this case is also considered as zero?

if i apply a force on a stationary object, and it move a certain time after the force has removed. should i take the zero as initial velocity or the instantaneous velocity when the force just applied on it?

Please help, I'm very confused. thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are confused over the idea of work done on the body, and work done by the forces.
Let's say I apply a constant force on a body to accelerate it from rest to a speed v over a smooth surface. Then, assuming that no resistive forces exist, work done by the force on the body is equal to the total net work done on the body, 0.5mv2. Then I remove this force, and it continues moving in a straight line with velocity v. For it to come to a stop, a resistive force must act on it. So, we let the body move over a rough surface. Thus, the frictional force does negative work on the body (since it is opposite in direction to the body's displacement) - i.e. extracting energy from the body. When the body comes to a rest, then you are right in saying that the net work done on the body is zero. The work done by each force on the body is however not zero, and total net work done on the body is the sum of the work done on the body by each force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top