"Calculating Work Needed to Change Orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter Identity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work needed for a shuttle to deploy a satellite from an orbit at 400 km to 600 km, the correct approach involves using gravitational potential energy (U) and kinetic energy (E_k) equations. Initial calculations yielded inconsistent results, prompting a discussion on measuring distances from the center of mass. The total energy of the satellite is not constant during the transition, leading to confusion between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy calculations. A simpler formula for small changes in radius was suggested for clarity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying gravitational equations to achieve accurate results.
Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A shuttle orbiting the Earth at 400km deploys a satellite of mass 800kg into orbit a further 200km from earth. Calculate the work that must be done by the shuttle to deploy the sattelite.

Homework Equations



E_{k} = \frac{GMm}{2r}, U = -\frac{GMm}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using W = \Delta E_{k} to solve the problem:

800GM\left(\frac{1}{2 \times 600000} - \frac{1}{2 \times 400000}\right)=-1.334 \times 10^{11} J

But the solutions gives 1.4 \times 10^9 J

Moreover, using the following method gives a different answer:

\int_{400000}^{600000} \frac{GM(800)}{r^2}dr=2.658 \times 10^{11} J

But I thought E_{tot} = E_{k} + U, so \Delta E_{k} = -\Delta U ??

Could someone tell me why my methods do not work and what the correct method is for dealing with this? Thankyou
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a case of mistaken Identity …

Hi Identity! :smile:
Identity said:
A shuttle orbiting the Earth at 400km deploys a satellite of mass 800kg into orbit a further 200km from earth. Calculate the work that must be done by the shuttle to deploy the sattelite.

Could someone tell me why my methods do not work

They do work …

but you need to measure r from … ? :wink:
 
Oh right I need to measure r from the centre of mass XD thanks tiny-tim

But

800GM\left(\frac{1}{2(6.4 \times 10^6 + 600000)} - \frac{1}{2(6.4 \times 10^6 + 400000)}\right)=-6.7 \times 10^8 J

which is still different!

Also, when the satellite moves from 400km to 600km, is the total energy of the satellite constant? If so, why do I get different answers when working with GPE as opposed to Kinetic energy?
 
Identity said:
800GM\left(\frac{1}{2(6.4 \times 10^6 + 600000)} - \frac{1}{2(6.4 \times 10^6 + 400000)}\right)=-6.7 \times 10^8 J

which is still different!

WIhtout seeing the details of your calculation, I can't check it …

but it would be a lot easier to use the formula 1/r - 1/(r + ∆) ~ ∆/r2 :wink:

anyway, going to bed now … :zzz:
 
lol I just plugged the whole calculation into my calculator...

Sorry I'm having some trouble understanding. Can you show me how you would do it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top