Undergrad Calculating Work Needed to Stretch a Spring: 100J to 0.75m

Click For Summary
To calculate the work needed to stretch a spring, it's essential to recognize that work is not constant and cannot be calculated using the simple formula W = Fd. Instead, Hooke's Law (F = kx) should be applied, where k is the spring constant. The correct approach involves integrating the force over the distance stretched, requiring careful attention to the limits of integration. The initial work done to stretch the spring 0.5m is 100J, which helps determine the spring constant k as 800. Ultimately, the total work needed to stretch the spring an additional 0.75m is found to be 525J.
iPhotonHQ
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
"It takes 100J of work to stretch a spring 0.5m from its equilibrium position. How much work is needed to stretch it an additional 0.75m."
Attempt: w = ⌠abF(x)dx
work = F x D
100J = F x 0.5m
F = 200J

0.75 + 0.5 = 1.25
w = ⌠0.51.25 200dx
w = 150 J

The correct answer: w = 525 J

what did I do wrong? Thanks!

Nevermind, I found the exact problem online, so sorry!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work is not constant in spring.You can't use W=Fd.You should take an integral
(Carefull for the signs when you take an integral).
Another thing that Questions ask "The work done by our force".
 
Arman777 said:
Work is not constant in spring.You can't use W=Fd.You should take an integral
(Carefull for the signs when u take an integral).
Another thing that Questions ask "The work done by our force".
My problem was that I forgot hooke's law.
F = kx
I can apply it to the given information to find the target solution.
 
Any ideas How ?
 
Arman777 said:
Any ideas How ?
w = ⌠.51.25 kx dx
you can solve for k by plugging in known integral...
100 = ⌠0.5kxdx

you should get k = 800
 
great
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K