Calculating Work Required to Pull a Hanging String Onto a Table

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work required to pull a hanging string onto a table, one must consider that the length of the hanging portion and its corresponding mass change as the string is pulled. The initial assumption of using a constant force is incorrect due to the variable mass of the hanging section. Instead, the problem requires integration to account for the changing force as the string is lifted. The correct approach involves calculating the work done using the formula for gravitational potential energy, leading to the conclusion that the work done is mgL/32. Clarification on the integration method is sought for a more precise solution.
forty
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
An infinitesimally thin rope is held on a frictionless table with one-fourth of its length hanging over the edge. If the rope has length L and total mass m (assuming uniform mass distribution), how much work is required to pull the hanging part back onto the table.

U = mgh

The length of the overhanging piece of string is (L/4) and the mass of this piece is (m/4) so do i just plug in the values, presuming I'm using the right equation... work = mLg/16 ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not really. Since the length of the rope hanging of the table varies when you pull it, the mass on the part hanging of the table varies, and therefore also the force. This means that you can't just take force times distance to get the total energy, since the force is not constant.
 
Last edited:
take an elementary length dl,then dm=(m/l)dl.now integrate it within proper limits.remeber work done=-w by mg.
good luck!
 
I'm really stuck at how to solve this "properly" using an integral. I can solve this by treating the piece of the string over the edge as a point mass..

mass of string = m/4
distance moved = L/8

.: workdone = mgh = (m/4) * g * (L/8) = mgL/32

If anyone could shed some light on the above mentioned method it would be greatly appreciated.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top