Calculating Work Required to Pump Water Out of a Vat

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tclack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to pump water out of a vat with a depth of 2 meters and a weight density of 9810 N/m³. The user derived the volume of water using the formula for a triangular volume and set up the integral for work, resulting in a calculation of W=130800 N·m. However, the user identified a discrepancy, noting that their answer was half of the expected value and sought clarification on the missing factor in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of fluid mechanics, particularly weight density of fluids
  • Familiarity with geometric volume calculations, especially for triangular prisms
  • Experience with setting up and solving definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of work and energy in fluid mechanics
  • Study the derivation of volume formulas for various geometric shapes
  • Learn about the application of definite integrals in physics problems
  • Examine similar problems involving the calculation of work in pumping fluids
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, physics, and mathematics who are involved in fluid dynamics and work-energy calculations will benefit from this discussion.

Tclack
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
A vat (shown in attachment) contains water 2 m deep. Find work required to pump all water out of top of vat. (weight density of water density= 9810 N/m^3)

[itex]W=\int^b_a F(x)dx[/itex]

weight of water=[itex]F(x)=V\rho[/itex]

put my figure on the coordinate axis so I came up with general equation for the base, with respect to height (using a y=mx+b format):


[itex]h=\frac{3}{2}b-3[/itex]
but, I want to go down a positive depth, so I negated the equation:
[itex]h=-\frac{3}{2}b+3[/itex]
[itex]b= (h-3)\frac{-2}{3}[/itex]
[itex]b=\frac{2}{3}(3-h)[/itex]---------------------------------(1)

As you can see, the above equation follows correctly, at a depth(h) of 0, we have a base of 2, at a depth(h) of 3 we have a base of 0, so the equation is valid, so far no mess-ups... I hope

Now, the general equation for a triangular volume is: Volume= [itex]V=\frac{1}{2}bhL[/itex] (b=base, h=height, L=length)
But, because my equation for b is only taking one half of the triangle, I double it:
[itex]V=2(\frac{1}{2}bhL)=bhL[/itex]-------------------------------(2)
substituting (1) into (2) I get
[itex]V=\frac{2}{3}(3-h) hL= L=6m so[/itex]
[itex]V=4(3h-h^2)[/itex]

therefore
[itex]W=\int^3_1 F(x)dx=\int^3_1 V\rho dx=\int^3_1 4(3h-h^2)(9810) dx[/itex]
[itex]W=4(9810)(\frac{3h^2}{2}-\frac{h^3}{3})\mid^3_1[/itex]
W=130800
...which is exactly half of the answer, I just can't seem to find that missing 2 despite being so concise. I remembered to double the volume of my second figure to take into account the full triangle base. Please help me find this... it's so close
 

Attachments

  • work.jpg
    work.jpg
    10.1 KB · Views: 431
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K