Calculating Ym and R for Two-Slit Interference: Tips and Tricks"

tj.
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Right so I've been stuck with this for a while now and I'm sure it's just something simple that I've missed. Right so the question says there are a pair of closely spaced slits (0.300mm apart). By changing the spacing the bright fringe moves from position m=2 to m=3. The wavelength remains constant. And that is all the information given in the question.



ym=R(mλ/d)

So I've been given m and d but I don't have ym or R (being the distance between the screen and the slits).




I would be very grateful if someone could be help find ym or R. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you could assume R is constant if the screen is far away relative to the slit spacing?

Perhaps you could reproduce the question in full, because it is slightly ambiguous at the moment. What is it asking you to work out?
 
Okay sorry:

'You shine a laser on a pair of closely spaced slits. By turning the knob, you can change the spacing of the slits. (The wavelength of the laser light remains constant.) Initially, the slits are 0.300mm apart.

You change the spacing of the slits so that the m=2 bright fringe moves to the position initially occupied by the m=3 bright fringe. What is the new spacing of the slits?'
 
Well you don't need to worry about R, it is effectively constant over the region you're interested in (far field).

You might understand better what Ym is if you drew a picture of the experiment.

You can use the equation you wrote down for each different d:

y_3 = 3 R \lambda / d_1
y_2 = 2 R \lambda / d_2

I've just replaced m for its value for the two different slit widths. If you understand what Ym is you ought to be able to relate those two equations given what you've been told in the question?
 
Thanks JesseC! That's what it was, I was always trying to find a value for R. Thanks
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
792
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top