Calculation Involving Projection Tensor in Minkowski Spacetime

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the expression ##P^{\gamma}_{\alpha}U^{\beta}\partial_{\beta}U^{\alpha}## in Minkowski spacetime, where ##P^{\gamma}_{\alpha}=\delta^{\gamma}_{\alpha}+U_{\alpha}U^{\gamma}##. The user successfully simplifies the expression to ##U^{\beta}\partial_{\beta}U^{\gamma}+U_{\alpha}U^{\gamma}U^{\beta}\partial_{\beta}U^{\alpha}## but encounters challenges in further simplification. The introduction of the geodesic equation ##U^{\upsilon}\nabla_{\upsilon}U^{\mu}=0## is noted as a potential simplification strategy, particularly in flat spacetime where it reduces to ##U^{\upsilon}\partial_{\upsilon}U^{\mu}=0##. The user confirms that the second term can be eliminated, leading to a final expression that may not simplify further.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski spacetime and its properties
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and operations
  • Knowledge of geodesic equations in general relativity
  • Concept of material time derivatives in fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the geodesic equation in flat spacetime
  • Research the properties of projection tensors in relativity
  • Explore the concept of material time derivatives in different fluid models
  • Investigate simplification techniques for tensor expressions in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity, fluid dynamics, and tensor calculus in Minkowski spacetime.

crime9894
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
I am asked to calculate the expression in Minkowski spacetime
Relevant Equations
Projection tensor ##P^{\alpha\beta}=\eta^{\alpha\beta}+U^{\alpha}U^{\beta}##
4-velocity ##U^{\mu}##
Minkowski Metric ##\eta^{\alpha\beta}## signature ##(-+++)##
In Minkowski spacetime, calculate ##P^{\gamma}_{\alpha}U^{\beta}\partial_{\beta}U^{\alpha}##.

I had calculated previously that ##P^{\gamma}_{\alpha}=\delta^{\gamma}_{\alpha}+U_{\alpha}U^{\gamma}##
When I subsitute it back into the expression
##P^{\gamma}_{\alpha}U^{\beta}\partial_{\beta}U^{\alpha}##
##=(\delta^{\gamma}_{\alpha}+U_{\alpha}U^{\gamma})U^{\beta}\partial_{\beta}U^{\alpha}##
##=U^{\beta}\partial_{\beta}U^{\gamma}+U_{\alpha}U^{\gamma}U^{\beta}\partial_{\beta}U^{\alpha}##
But I think hit a dead end. Could it be further simplified?

Later, I look back into my lecture slides again and I saw this "geodesics equation ##U^{\upsilon}\nabla_{\upsilon}U^{\mu}=0##" written at a corner. I haven't reach geodesics yet and I can't find relevant source on confirming this equation.

I believe it reduce to ##U^{\upsilon}\partial_{\upsilon}U^{\mu}=0## in flat spacetime and would one-shot my problem.
Is this the correct approach instead? If so, how do I prove the equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that ##U^{\nu} \partial_{\nu} U^{\mu}=\mathrm{D}_{\tau} U^{\mu}## is the "material time derivative". This is 0 for "dust", i.e., for non-interacting "particles" only. For an ideal or viscous fluid it's not!

Concerning implification of your expression, note that ##U_{\alpha} U^{\alpha}=-1=\text{const}##. What does that imply for the 2nd term in your result?
 
vanhees71 said:
Concerning implification of your expression, note that ##U_{\alpha} U^{\alpha}=-1=\text{const}##. What does that imply for the 2nd term in your result?
I see! Thank you.
I could prove ##U_{\alpha}\partial_{\beta}U^{\alpha}=0## and eliminate second term.
As for the first term, I don't think it could proceed further. Am I done?
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K