Calculation of Percentage Composition of Hydroxyapatite in Tooth Enamel Sample

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuarkCharmer
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the percentage composition of hydroxyapatite in a tooth enamel sample. Initially, the user incorrectly calculated the mass of hydroxyapatite, resulting in an implausible percentage of 900.33%. Upon realizing the mistake in the mole conversion factor, the user recalculated and found the mass of hydroxyapatite to be 1.005678g. This corrected calculation yielded a percentage composition of approximately 90.034%. The final result indicates a significant presence of hydroxyapatite in the tooth enamel sample.
QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Tooth enamel is mainly hydroxyapatite,
Ca_{10}(PO_{4})_{6}(OH)_{2}
If 1.117g of tooth enamel reacts with acid to give 1.111g of Calcium Chloride, what is the percentage of hydroxyapatite in the tooth enamel sample?


Homework Equations

\

Ca_{10}(PO_{4})_{6}(OH)_{2}_{(s)} + 20HCl_{(aq)} \rightarrow 10CaCl_{2}_{(aq)} + 6H_{3}PO_{4}_{(aq)} + 2H_{2}O_{(l)}

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know why, these questions always cause me problems. Writing out my work now...

1.111g CaCl2 * \frac{1 mol CaCl2}{110.9834g CaCl2} * \frac{1 mol Hydroxyapatite}{1 mol CaCl2} * \frac{1004.6228g Hydroxyapatite}{1 mol Hydroxyapatite} = Xg Hydroxyapatite

X = 10.05678 g Hydroxyapatite

How can that be?

That number (X) over the initial mass of the tooth enamel (1.117) should give me the percentage. But there is no way that this is correct..

\frac{10.05678}{1.117} *100\% = 900.33\%

Edit: Now that I look at it, it appears I used the wrong unit factor for converting moles... I'm working on it again.

Okay here it is:
1.111g CaCl2 * \frac{1 mol CaCl2}{110.9834g CaCl2} * \frac{1 mol Hydroxyapatite}{10 mol CaCl2} * \frac{1004.6228g Hydroxyapatite}{1 mol Hydroxyapatite} = 1.005678g Hydroxyapatite

and then:

\frac{1.005678}{1.117} * 100\% = 90.034\%

How does that look?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Much better now.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top