Calculus and Vectors - Determining intersection for lines and planes

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using normal vectors to determine the intersection of three planes and the geometric interpretations of these intersections. It emphasizes that while the first and third planes are parallel and do not intersect, the first and second planes, as well as the second and third planes, do intersect. Participants highlight the importance of providing a geometric description of these intersections, explaining that two intersecting planes form a line. Clarification is sought on what constitutes a "geometric interpretation," with examples provided to illustrate the concept. The conversation stresses the need for a comprehensive understanding of the problem, including the number of solutions for the linear systems involved.
ttpp1124
Messages
110
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Use normal vectors to determine the intersection, if any, for each of the following groups of three planes. Give a geometric interpretation in each case and the number of solutions for the corresponding linear system of equations. If the planes intersect in a line, determine a vector equation of the line. If the planes intersect in a point, determine the coordinates of the point.

I solved it, can someone tell me if I'm correct? Thanks!
Relevant Equations
n/a
IMG_3637.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ttpp1124 said:
Homework Statement:: Use normal vectors to determine the intersection, if any, for each of the following groups of three planes. Give a geometric interpretation in each case and the number of solutions for the corresponding linear system of equations. If the planes intersect in a line, determine a vector equation of the line. If the planes intersect in a point, determine the coordinates of the point.

I solved it, can someone tell me if I'm correct? Thanks!
Relevant Equations:: n/a

View attachment 260149
You're correct in saying that the first and third plane are parallel, so won't intersect, but there's a lot more that you didn't address. The problem asks that you "Use normal vectors to determine the intersection, if any, for each of the following groups of three planes."
The first and second planes intersect, as do the second and third planes.
What is the geometric interpretation of the intersections of the first and second planes, as well as of the second and third planes?

How many solutions are there for the two cases I listed?

Be sure you understand all of what the problem is asking for, only part of which I listed above.
 
Mark44 said:
You're correct in saying that the first and third plane are parallel, so won't intersect, but there's a lot more that you didn't address. The problem asks that you "Use normal vectors to determine the intersection, if any, for each of the following groups of three planes."
The first and second planes intersect, as do the second and third planes.
What is the geometric interpretation of the intersections of the first and second planes, as well as of the second and third planes?

How many solutions are there for the two cases I listed?

Be sure you understand all of what the problem is asking for, only part of which I listed above.
what does "geometric interpretation" mean?
 
ttpp1124 said:
what does "geometric interpretation" mean?
Here's an example. Consider the equations 2x + 3y + z = 5 and x - 2y - z = 3, in space. Normal vectors are, respectively, <2, 3, 1> and <1, -2, -1>. It's obvious that the normals aren't parallel (or antiparallel), so these planes intersect. When two planes intersect, they do so in a line.
Describing the geometry that the equations represent is what is meant by "geometric interpretation."
 
Mark44 said:
Here's an example. Consider the equations 2x + 3y + z = 5 and x - 2y - z = 3, in space. Normal vectors are, respectively, <2, 3, 1> and <1, -2, -1>. It's obvious that the normals aren't parallel (or antiparallel), so these planes intersect. When two planes intersect, they do so in a line.
Describing the geometry that the equations represent is what is meant by "geometric interpretation."
I end up with two vector equations, am I correct?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3645.jpg
    IMG_3645.jpg
    65.2 KB · Views: 233
ttpp1124 said:
I end up with two vector equations, am I correct?
No, neither is correct. Subtracting the two vectors is the wrong way to go.
First off, how do the first and second planes intersect? You need to describe this intersection in geometric terms; i.e., in a sentence with words. A sketch of the two planes and how they meet would be helpful. You don't need to include coordinate axes, but you should include a normal vector for each plane.

Here's an example of what I'm talking about. The geometric description should say in words, not equations, what the picture is showing -- how the planes are intersecting, and what sort of geometric object the intersection represents.
Planes.png
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K