Calculus II question, prove ∫ ≤ 14/3 without evaluating the integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the integral ∫(0,3) √(x+e^-x)dx is less than or equal to 14/3 without evaluating the integral. Participants are exploring various bounding techniques and reasoning related to the behavior of the function within the specified interval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest finding bounding functions to compare against √(x+e^-x) within the interval. Some propose evaluating the maximum value of the function and multiplying it by the interval length as a potential upper bound. Others question the effectiveness of certain bounds and seek clarification on how to establish a valid comparison.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing various ideas and approaches. Some have found certain bounding techniques useful, while others express confusion about how to effectively demonstrate the inequality. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the problem's requirements, and several participants are attempting different strategies to clarify their understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of not being able to evaluate the integral directly and the need to work within the constraints of the problem. There is an emphasis on exploring the properties of the function and its behavior over the interval from 0 to 3.

dillon131222
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that ∫(0,3) √(x+e^-x)dx ≤ 14/3 (hint: do not attempt to evaluate the integral)when looking at the integral from 0 to 3 on the graph I can see that this is true, but not sure how to go about showing this without evaluating the integral, any help as to how to go about this would be great.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't know how exactly they want you to solve this, but you can find functions that are greater than your's in the integration interval.
For example:
√(x+e^-x) ≤ √3 in (0,2) and √(x+e^-x) ≤ √4 in (2,3).
So ∫(0,3) √(x+e^-x)dx ≤ 2√3+2
This bounding is awful but I think it's useful as example.
 


Find the maximum value of the function on the interval and multiply that by the interval length, tat is the maximum possible value for the integral (the upper bound). Try that and let us know how it goes.
 


I think you will have good luck by overestimating the ##e^{-x}## and evaluating the resulting integral.
 


TheForce said:
Find the maximum value of the function on the interval and multiply that by the interval length, tat is the maximum possible value for the integral (the upper bound). Try that and let us know how it goes.

so find the maximum value of √(x+e-x) and multiply by the interval length of 3?

the function is increasing from [0,3] so max is at position 3, √(3+e-3 ≈ 1.7464, 1.7464x3 ≈ 5.2391, which is greater than 14/3 so guessing I'm doing something wrong for your suggestion?


gonna attempt the other suggestions now
 


SqueeSpleen said:
I don't know how exactly they want you to solve this, but you can find functions that are greater than your's in the integration interval.
For example:
√(x+e^-x) ≤ √3 in (0,2) and √(x+e^-x) ≤ √4 in (2,3).
So ∫(0,3) √(x+e^-x)dx ≤ 2√3+2
This bounding is awful but I think it's useful as example.

need to show that the integral is ≤ 14/3, so don't see how showing that its ≤ 2√3+2 which = 5.46 helps(?) or am i misunderstanding?

LCKurtz said:
I think you will have good luck by overestimating the e-x and evaluating the resulting integral.

not sure what you mean by overestimating e-x

really not sure what's wanted for this question, not very good at this yet :/ I am just starting to understand the basics of integrals right now
 


dillon131222 said:
need to show that the integral is ≤ 14/3, so don't see how showing that its ≤ 2√3+2 which = 5.46 helps(?) or am i misunderstanding?
You have found a rather crude bound by drawing a horizontal line at ##y = \sqrt{3 + e^{-3}}##. But the function value is much smaller at ##x = 0##: ##\sqrt{0 + e^0} = 1##. Try taking advantage of that fact, for example, by drawing a line from the point ##(x=0, y=1)## to ##(x = 3, y=\sqrt{3 + e^{-3}})##. Does your function stay below that line? If so, that will give you a smaller bound.
 


You could always compare your integral to something else since it's not integrable by elementary means, but this question is odd as is.

I was thinking that you should bound your integral with an easier integral to evaluate which is bigger, but still less than or equal to 14/3.

So since the bigger integral would evaluate easily to something nice and the value was less than 14/3, it would imply your integral was also less than 14/3.
 


dillon131222 said:
need to show that the integral is ≤ 14/3...
not sure what you mean by overestimating e-x

What is the largest value ##e^{-x}## attains on [0,3]? Overestimate the integral by replacing ##e^{-x}## with that largest value. It will give you a simpler integral you can work.
 
  • #10


jbunniii said:
You have found a rather crude bound by drawing a horizontal line at ##y = \sqrt{3 + e^{-3}}##. But the function value is much smaller at ##x = 0##: ##\sqrt{0 + e^0} = 1##. Try taking advantage of that fact, for example, by drawing a line from the point ##(x=0, y=1)## to ##(x = 3, y=\sqrt{3 + e^{-3}})##. Does your function stay below that line? If so, that will give you a smaller bound.

dont understand how to find a bound, isn't the integral bound from 0 to 3?
 
  • #11


LCKurtz said:
What is the largest value ##e^{-x}## attains on [0,3]? Overestimate the integral by replacing ##e^{-x}## with that largest value. It will give you a simpler integral you can work.

I see, that worked perfectly and much simpler, thank you so much :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K