Calculus Problem: Analyzing Cost of Silver Mine Production

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Physics1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
The cost of producing x ounces of silver from a silver mine is c = f(x) dollars.

a) What does the derivative of f(x) mean?

Is the derivative the instantaneous cost?

Is f(x) the average cost to get silver out of the ground or the change in cost over change in ounces?


b) What does the statement f ' (600) = 25 mean?

Does this mean that plugging in a x value 600 yields a y value (amount of instantaneous dollars) of 25?

c) Do you think f ' (x) will increase/decrease in short run? Long run? Explain.

I just would say if we go back to silver standard, it would decrease (economies of scale) in both long run and short run.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This isn't generic calculus; it is economics. What have you learned so far in Econ?
 
EnumaElish said:
This isn't generic calculus; it is economics. What have you learned so far in Econ?

lol. No it's not. I just have to come up with a function (wiggly stuff, exponential, etc.) and convince my teacher that it's ok. I have to come up with something to do part c.
 
EnumaElish said:
That's the problem -- "short run" and "long run" are Econ concepts with precise definitions in terms of costs.

It really said short term but I just put short run. It's basically the same thing. I can't do c without a graph.

What about a and b?
 
So, you looked at the Wiki link, and decided it isn't useful?
 
EnumaElish said:
So, you looked at the Wiki link, and decided it isn't useful?

Well, c is irrelevant to what a and b are asking. It's a math class (not business calc). She just wants us to come up with a graph to convince her on part c. Most likely she won't be picky.
 
  • #10
I suggested the Wiki article for parts a and b.
 
  • #11
EnumaElish said:
I suggested the Wiki article for parts a and b.

Oh, so the derivative of f(x) is the change in total cost / change in quantity.
 
  • #12
Correct.
 
  • #13
EnumaElish said:
Correct.

Let's say there's a function y = f(x). and a tangent line at x = 3. Is that the instantaneous unit (whatever you're measuring)?
 
  • #14
Physics1 said:
Let's say there's a function y = f(x). and a tangent line at x = 3. Is that the instantaneous unit (whatever you're measuring)?
The slope of the tangent line is the change in y resulting from a very small change in x (from 3 to 3 + epsilon), divided by the change in x.
 
  • #15
EnumaElish said:
The slope of the tangent line is the change in y resulting from a very small change in x (from 3 to 3 + epsilon), divided by the change in x.

What about the point of the tangent line that's touching the function?

It passes through points (-2, 3) and (4, -1)

I got y = -(2/3)x + 13/3 for the tangent line using basic algebra.

It says plug in f ' (3) and f(3)

How would I know the original equation y = f(x)?
 
  • #16
Physics1 said:
The cost of producing x ounces of silver from a silver mine is c = f(x) dollars.

a) What does the derivative of f(x) mean?

Is the derivative the instantaneous cost?

Is f(x) the average cost to get silver out of the ground or the change in cost over change in ounces?


b) What does the statement f ' (600) = 25 mean?

Does this mean that plugging in a x value 600 yields a y value (amount of instantaneous dollars) of 25?

c) Do you think f ' (x) will increase/decrease in short run? Long run? Explain.

I just would say if we go back to silver standard, it would decrease (economies of scale) in both long run and short run.

Do you not understand that the derivative of f is the "instantaneous rate of change" of f? If so then all of these should be easy. Certainly "Does this mean that plugging in a x value 600 (in f '(x)) yields a y value (amount of instantaneous dollars) of 25?" is not true: that's what f(x) gives you. f '(x) is not just another name for f(x)!
 
  • #17
Physics1 said:
What about the point of the tangent line that's touching the function?
Ordinarily, a tangent line "barely touches" the function at the point where f' is evaluated (in your example, x = 3). That's different from intersecting the function, e.g. the way the normal line (perpendicular line) does.
It passes through points (-2, 3) and (4, -1)
I am going to assume that means the tangent line intersects f(x) at points p = (-2, 3) and q = (4, -1). If that's what you mean, it doesn't mean anything special. A tangent line might intersect the function at an arbitrary number of points. What is special about the tangent line is that has the same slope as the function at the point where f' is evaluated. For any other point, the tangent line is an arbitrary graphical object.
I got y = -(2/3)x + 13/3 for the tangent line using basic algebra.

It says plug in f ' (3) and f(3)

How would I know the original equation y = f(x)?
How did you derive the tangent line if you didn't know the function f?
 
  • #18
EnumaElish said:
Ordinarily, a tangent line "barely touches" the function at the point where f' is evaluated (in your example, x = 3). That's different from intersecting the function, e.g. the way the normal line (perpendicular line) does.I am going to assume that means the tangent line intersects f(x) at points p = (-2, 3) and q = (4, -1). If that's what you mean, it doesn't mean anything special. A tangent line might intersect the function at an arbitrary number of points. What is special about the tangent line is that has the same slope as the function at the point where f' is evaluated. For any other point, the tangent line is an arbitrary graphical object.How did you derive the tangent line if you didn't know the function f?

Well, actually I'm getting y = -2/3x + (5/3) for the tangent line now. I got it from those two points. Maybe f(x) is just a straight line and those 2 points can be used to find the whole line (slope).
 
Back
Top